Evidence for the impurity of what is not eaten

The questioner : The topic of the application is the difference between the urine of what is eaten and the urine of what is not eaten. I tried to go back to the *Mufaddalat* to find evidence for the impurity of the urine of what is not eaten, but I did not find it.

The Shaykh : Do not mix exaggeration with wasting money. This peel is eaten by some people along with the kernel, so if you remove the peel, value the peel, not a portion of the kernel along with the peel.

The questioner : Let us take what we have to drink.

The Shaykh : Yes. Do you remember the hadith of al-Kalbi and its relevance? Do you remember its relevance? Its relevance is that the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) was asked about water that wild animals drink from, and he said, "If the water is two qullahs, it does not carry lice." This means that the saliva and droppings of wild animals are impure. Therefore, he said that if the water is of this quantity, it can bear the impurity. The word "impurity" refers to the drinking of wild animals in that water; this drinking is impure, but as long as the water is abundant, it can bear this impurity. Okay. If the child... what she drank in her stomach... her location... In the name of Allah.