The Ruling of the Judge After the Refusal of Reconciliation Based on Denial

Question:
So I said: If the defendant refuses reconciliation based on denial, and the plaintiff takes the case to the court, is the judge's ruling considered a settlement, or is it a separate, independent ruling?

Answer:
The judge's ruling is considered binding. It is considered binding, not a settlement. It is binding by virtue of the evidence or by virtue of the denial. The evidence is from the plaintiff, or the oath is by the denial of the defendant, as the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) said: This is a great judicial principle: the burden of proof is on the claimant. If people were given what they claimed, people would claim the blood and property of others. But the burden of proof is . So what reaches the judge is considered binding. Yes.