How Jurists Prefer One Narration Over Another Within a School of Jurisprudence
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
The issue of oil and their statement: how can jurists prefer one narration over another regarding its impact, and their statement that this is the correct narration of the school?
Answer:
This is not possible except through experience and study of the school, as the author of al-Inṣāf did, and as was done in his commentary on al-Furūq. This is through experience and knowledge of the Imam’s statements, those of the early and later scholars, and their connection to the evidence. It is not possible except through experience.
The issue of oil and their statement: how can jurists prefer one narration over another regarding its impact, and their statement that this is the correct narration of the school?
Answer:
This is not possible except through experience and study of the school, as the author of al-Inṣāf did, and as was done in his commentary on al-Furūq. This is through experience and knowledge of the Imam’s statements, those of the early and later scholars, and their connection to the evidence. It is not possible except through experience.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، 001 من 123 / شرح كتاب زاد المستقنع / مقدمة الشيخ / صالح الفوزان / الفقه / كبار العلماء — youtube.com (1:02:32)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.