The evidence that the one who objected to the sale of intoxicants to 'Umar was a Companion
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
Your Eminence, father, the questioner says: You previously stated with us that the one who objected to 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) regarding the sale of intoxicants was a Companion. He asks: What is the evidence that he was a Companion?
The Shaykh:
It came in the narration, "and they named him afterwards." They named him, but we do not like to mention his name, as he was named in some authentic narrations. Yes.
The questioner:
What Allah willed for you.
The Shaykh:
It was an exercise of independent legal reasoning (ijtihad) on his part (may Allah be pleased with him). Yes.
Your Eminence, father, the questioner says: You previously stated with us that the one who objected to 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) regarding the sale of intoxicants was a Companion. He asks: What is the evidence that he was a Companion?
The Shaykh:
It came in the narration, "and they named him afterwards." They named him, but we do not like to mention his name, as he was named in some authentic narrations. Yes.
The questioner:
What Allah willed for you.
The Shaykh:
It was an exercise of independent legal reasoning (ijtihad) on his part (may Allah be pleased with him). Yes.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، 61 من 64\شرح عمدة الأحكام (شرح كامل مع أسئلة)\الأشربة\تحريم الخمر\صالح الفوزان\الفقه — youtube.com (1:00:46)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.