Questions on the Explanation of the Book of Nullifiers of Islam
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
Some people say that showing loyalty to disbelievers and supporting them takes three forms. The first is complete, absolute, and general loyalty, which is disbelief that expels one from the religion. The second is for the sake of obtaining a specific benefit, where there is no compulsion such as fear or the like, and this is forbidden but not disbelief. The third is due to fear of the disbelievers or the like, and the ruling in that case is permissibility, on the condition that this loyalty is only in appearance and not in the heart. The question is: Is this division correct?
The Shaykh:
Yes, this is a summary of what we mentioned in our entire lesson today. These words are a summary of what we mentioned in our entire lesson; they are summarized, and we have detailed them. Yes.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you, Honorable Shaykh.
The questioner:
And to whom is this attributed?
The Shaykh:
It was not attributed to anyone; it was attributed to some of the scholars of knowledge. It is not befitting for a person, when he makes a claim, to simply state the ruling without clarifying who said it and which book mentioned it, so that we may know these matters. Yes. But it is a correct statement, and it is a summary of what we mentioned.
Some people say that showing loyalty to disbelievers and supporting them takes three forms. The first is complete, absolute, and general loyalty, which is disbelief that expels one from the religion. The second is for the sake of obtaining a specific benefit, where there is no compulsion such as fear or the like, and this is forbidden but not disbelief. The third is due to fear of the disbelievers or the like, and the ruling in that case is permissibility, on the condition that this loyalty is only in appearance and not in the heart. The question is: Is this division correct?
The Shaykh:
Yes, this is a summary of what we mentioned in our entire lesson today. These words are a summary of what we mentioned in our entire lesson; they are summarized, and we have detailed them. Yes.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you, Honorable Shaykh.
The questioner:
And to whom is this attributed?
The Shaykh:
It was not attributed to anyone; it was attributed to some of the scholars of knowledge. It is not befitting for a person, when he makes a claim, to simply state the ruling without clarifying who said it and which book mentioned it, so that we may know these matters. Yes. But it is a correct statement, and it is a summary of what we mentioned.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، 223من279/اسئلة شرح كتاب نواقض الاسلام/موالاة الكفار/صالح الفوزان/كبار العلماء/عقيدة — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.
