What is the ruling on one who passes the miqat without entering the state of ihram?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : The second question. Come. If a pilgrim performing Hajj or 'Umrah passes the miqat without entering the state of ihram, is he required to go back and enter ihram from the miqat, or does he enter ihram from his current location? And is a sacrificial animal required of him in this case, or not?
The Shaykh : He is required to go back to the miqat and enter ihram from there. If he is unable to go back, then he enters ihram from his current location, and he owes a fidyah (ransom payment) which he slaughters in Makkah and distributes to the poor. Is that permissible? Yes, it is permissible. You say, “I am unable to go to the miqat.” He is unable to go to the miqat. This is a darurah (dire necessity). He enters ihram from his location, and this serves as a substitute. Yes. He slaughters it in Makkah and distributes it to the poor.
The Shaykh : He is required to go back to the miqat and enter ihram from there. If he is unable to go back, then he enters ihram from his current location, and he owes a fidyah (ransom payment) which he slaughters in Makkah and distributes to the poor. Is that permissible? Yes, it is permissible. You say, “I am unable to go to the miqat.” He is unable to go to the miqat. This is a darurah (dire necessity). He enters ihram from his location, and this serves as a substitute. Yes. He slaughters it in Makkah and distributes it to the poor.
Source
سؤال من حاج 1407هـ - 3 — binothaimeen.net (9:23)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.