Discussion on being content with a ruler who declares Islam and is better than the ruler based on the socialist party

The Shaykh : But we are content with a ruler who declares ruling by Islam, whether he is Hanafi, Shafi'i, Maliki, or Hanbali... because good cannot be attained in a single step.

The questioner : In a single step.

The Shaykh : This is the way of Allah in the universe, through gradualism. Therefore, we are content with a ruler who declares ruling by Islam, and then we try to bring him closer to pure, clean Islam, and so on. This ruler... is undoubtedly better than that one based on the socialist party, which means Allah willed that this party be revealed... to the people after they had taken control and began to declare what? Their war against Islam. What if they actually succeeded, meaning a complete new communism? Your observation is undoubtedly in its place, but it is not hidden from you that such a step is not a field for delving into every issue in detail. Your topic now is the detailed position of Muslims toward the two groups. Undoubtedly, what you say is correct, but he cannot but present the topic in a general way. That is it.

The questioner : ... .

The Shaykh : ... .