Is it true that 'Abd Allah and Sulayman, the sons of Buraydah, did not hear from their father?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Well, what is meant by what was said about 'Abd Allah and his brother Sulayman, that they did not hear anything from their father Buraydah?
The Shaykh : This is something that is strongly refuted, and it is what the person we were afflicted with after al-Saqaf held onto.
The questioner : We ask Allah for help and well-being.
The Shaykh : This is Hassan.
The questioner : Ibn 'Abd al-Munan.
The Shaykh : How?
Al-Halabi : I asked him, did he visit you in Damascus? He said, yes.
The questioner : Our neighbor 'Abd al-Fattah introduced me to him once, yes.
The Shaykh : This man rejects authentic hadiths on the claim that he did not hear from him, yet his hearing is established. It can be found in the same Musnad from you; here there are several statements, and it is sufficient that he is relied upon, yes.
The questioner : He said, "I and my father entered upon Mu'awiyah."
The Shaykh : This is it, and there is more besides this, and it is sufficient that he is relied upon in the two Sahihs.
The questioner : He is among the narrators of the six books.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is established.
Al-Halabi : He rejected this, he rejected this chain with a claim. So far, for me, it is a claim, and I have not yet finished tracing it.
The Shaykh : Please go ahead.
Al-Halabi : He says that all the chains in which there is a statement of hearing from 'Abd Allah ibn Buraydah from his father are through Husayn ibn Waqid, and you know that a trustworthy narrator is rejected by the slightest criticism.
The Shaykh : Correct.
Al-Halabi : Yes, so I do not know how.
The Shaykh : No, this is not correct. I addressed the point.
Al-Halabi : Very good.
The Shaykh : In some of my notes, but the truth is I do not know. Perhaps in some of the hadiths he published in *al-Silsilah al-Sahihah* recently, so I rambled around this specific issue, yes.
Al-Halabi : What Allah willed.
The Shaykh : Yes, and even if we assume that it is not established except through this path, well, did anyone accuse him of tadlis? And he was relied upon.The Shaykh : This means it is not.
Al-Halabi : But he is following the rule that I obligated him to follow, which is that he does not accept mere contemporaneity; the meeting must be established. He is following the methodology of al-Bukhari and considers this a defect in the narrator's hearing if his meeting with his sheikh is not established.
The Shaykh : Well, what did he find out, that it was established or not established?
Al-Halabi : He says that through induction, we did not see this. This is a claim.
The Shaykh : Well, a claim does not establish knowledge; it must be established that he met him.
Al-Halabi : Yes, glory be to Allah.
The Shaykh : So that he can apply this theory of his.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Ah, that is it.
The Shaykh : This is something that is strongly refuted, and it is what the person we were afflicted with after al-Saqaf held onto.
The questioner : We ask Allah for help and well-being.
The Shaykh : This is Hassan.
The questioner : Ibn 'Abd al-Munan.
The Shaykh : How?
Al-Halabi : I asked him, did he visit you in Damascus? He said, yes.
The questioner : Our neighbor 'Abd al-Fattah introduced me to him once, yes.
The Shaykh : This man rejects authentic hadiths on the claim that he did not hear from him, yet his hearing is established. It can be found in the same Musnad from you; here there are several statements, and it is sufficient that he is relied upon, yes.
The questioner : He said, "I and my father entered upon Mu'awiyah."
The Shaykh : This is it, and there is more besides this, and it is sufficient that he is relied upon in the two Sahihs.
The questioner : He is among the narrators of the six books.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is established.
Al-Halabi : He rejected this, he rejected this chain with a claim. So far, for me, it is a claim, and I have not yet finished tracing it.
The Shaykh : Please go ahead.
Al-Halabi : He says that all the chains in which there is a statement of hearing from 'Abd Allah ibn Buraydah from his father are through Husayn ibn Waqid, and you know that a trustworthy narrator is rejected by the slightest criticism.
The Shaykh : Correct.
Al-Halabi : Yes, so I do not know how.
The Shaykh : No, this is not correct. I addressed the point.
Al-Halabi : Very good.
The Shaykh : In some of my notes, but the truth is I do not know. Perhaps in some of the hadiths he published in *al-Silsilah al-Sahihah* recently, so I rambled around this specific issue, yes.
Al-Halabi : What Allah willed.
The Shaykh : Yes, and even if we assume that it is not established except through this path, well, did anyone accuse him of tadlis? And he was relied upon.The Shaykh : This means it is not.
Al-Halabi : But he is following the rule that I obligated him to follow, which is that he does not accept mere contemporaneity; the meeting must be established. He is following the methodology of al-Bukhari and considers this a defect in the narrator's hearing if his meeting with his sheikh is not established.
The Shaykh : Well, what did he find out, that it was established or not established?
Al-Halabi : He says that through induction, we did not see this. This is a claim.
The Shaykh : Well, a claim does not establish knowledge; it must be established that he met him.
Al-Halabi : Yes, glory be to Allah.
The Shaykh : So that he can apply this theory of his.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Ah, that is it.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.