Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

And does this formulation suggest a break in the chain?

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : All right, our Shaykh, if a group of people narrated to us, or if it was from someone of less than that status, is the chain considered valid?

The Shaykh: Who is the one who says, "A group narrated to us"?

The questioner: A trustworthy person.

The Shaykh: A trustworthy man.

The questioner: Yes.

The Shaykh : He says, "A group of people narrated to us."

The questioner : In congregation.

The Shaykh: Yes.

The questioner: For example, from Ma'mar.

The Shaykh : Yes, indeed, the hadith is established.

The questioner : If it was from someone of less than that status.

The Shaykh : If he is what?

The questioner: Less than that, less than trustworthy.

The Shaykh : The ruling is the same; if his hadith is good, it is good, and if his hadith is weak, it is weak.

The questioner : Does the formulation "a group" suggest a break in the chain?

The Shaykh : How?

The questioner : Does "a group" suggest that the chain was broken?

The Shaykh : It does not suggest a break. A break occurs when a narrator is dropped from the chain. Here, the narrator was not dropped; rather, he was left unspecified and not named. If the unspecified person is a single individual, the hadith is not used as evidence. However, if it is a group, it is used as evidence.

The questioner : Based on the principle of mass transmission.

The Shaykh : A group, yes.
Source www.al-albany.com

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas