And for this reason, they wrote in the margin: 'Ufayr ibn Ma'dan al-Himshi.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : And for this reason, they wrote in the margin: 'Ufayr ibn Ma'dan al-Himshi.
The Shaykh : Is this the 'Ufayr that you have here?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Okay; is this one not abandoned?
The questioner : Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said about him: weak.
The Shaykh : Okay; did no one say about him: abandoned?
The questioner : No, I do not remember.
Abu Malik: This ... says here: 'Ufayr.
The questioner: Yes.
Abu Malik: From 'Ata al-Laythi, and from Waleed ibn Muslim, and 'Ali ibn 'Iyash. Al-Nasa'i said: He is not trustworthy.
The Shaykh : Hmm.
Another questioner : The conclusion: And in its margin, the complete statement of al-Nasa'i: and his hadith is not to be written down, no.
The Shaykh : It is a mess, a mess, Professor.
The questioner : Okay; so it is abandoned?
The Shaykh : Abandoned.
The questioner : Then it is very weak.
The Shaykh : But this, we say: abandoned; based on the hasty study, I give it a pass.
The questioner : Yes, yes, yes.
The Shaykh : By Allah, this hadith seems to be traced in some of the books.
The questioner : ... our Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Give me this pen.
Abu Malik: I will write it for you.
The Shaykh : Is there a paper?
The questioner : From Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him).
The Shaykh : Where did you obtain it, Professor?
The questioner : From tracing.
The Shaykh : This is the answer of the one who loses things.
The questioner : From the indexes, actually, because I often refer to the indexes.
The Shaykh: All right.
Another questioner : These indexes, our Shaykh, I mean, perhaps they corrupted more than they fixed, actually.
The questioner : And they have benefits.
Abu Malik: No, no, I say: Glory be to Allah!
The Shaykh : This is a point of view.
The questioner: Yes.
Another questioner: Yes.
The questioner : I say: Glory be to Allah, when these indexes did not exist, the precision in tracing was greater.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner : ... .
Abu Malik: Yes?
The questioner : A person reads.
Abu Malik: Yes, yes, yes.
The Shaykh: All right.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Now what is left with us?
The questioner : We have a mursal from Mujahid.
The Shaykh : Who are its narrators?
The questioner : Abu Dawud in "Al-Mursalat".
The Shaykh : "Al-Mursalat".
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Is its chain authentic?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Of course, the "Al-Mursalat" that I relied upon is the one with the verification by "Shu'ayb"?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : And did you see him authenticate the chain?
The questioner : He authenticated it.
The Shaykh : Yes, now I think we said we would start, before anything else, with researching the hadiths from the perspective of narration.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : And it seems we finished with this.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : It remains for us to research from the perspective of knowledge.
The questioner : Knowledge.
The Shaykh : Correct?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh: Good.
The Shaykh : Is this the 'Ufayr that you have here?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Okay; is this one not abandoned?
The questioner : Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said about him: weak.
The Shaykh : Okay; did no one say about him: abandoned?
The questioner : No, I do not remember.
Abu Malik: This ... says here: 'Ufayr.
The questioner: Yes.
Abu Malik: From 'Ata al-Laythi, and from Waleed ibn Muslim, and 'Ali ibn 'Iyash. Al-Nasa'i said: He is not trustworthy.
The Shaykh : Hmm.
Another questioner : The conclusion: And in its margin, the complete statement of al-Nasa'i: and his hadith is not to be written down, no.
The Shaykh : It is a mess, a mess, Professor.
The questioner : Okay; so it is abandoned?
The Shaykh : Abandoned.
The questioner : Then it is very weak.
The Shaykh : But this, we say: abandoned; based on the hasty study, I give it a pass.
The questioner : Yes, yes, yes.
The Shaykh : By Allah, this hadith seems to be traced in some of the books.
The questioner : ... our Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Give me this pen.
Abu Malik: I will write it for you.
The Shaykh : Is there a paper?
The questioner : From Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (may Allah be pleased with him).
The Shaykh : Where did you obtain it, Professor?
The questioner : From tracing.
The Shaykh : This is the answer of the one who loses things.
The questioner : From the indexes, actually, because I often refer to the indexes.
The Shaykh: All right.
Another questioner : These indexes, our Shaykh, I mean, perhaps they corrupted more than they fixed, actually.
The questioner : And they have benefits.
Abu Malik: No, no, I say: Glory be to Allah!
The Shaykh : This is a point of view.
The questioner: Yes.
Another questioner: Yes.
The questioner : I say: Glory be to Allah, when these indexes did not exist, the precision in tracing was greater.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner : ... .
Abu Malik: Yes?
The questioner : A person reads.
Abu Malik: Yes, yes, yes.
The Shaykh: All right.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Now what is left with us?
The questioner : We have a mursal from Mujahid.
The Shaykh : Who are its narrators?
The questioner : Abu Dawud in "Al-Mursalat".
The Shaykh : "Al-Mursalat".
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Is its chain authentic?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Of course, the "Al-Mursalat" that I relied upon is the one with the verification by "Shu'ayb"?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : And did you see him authenticate the chain?
The questioner : He authenticated it.
The Shaykh : Yes, now I think we said we would start, before anything else, with researching the hadiths from the perspective of narration.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : And it seems we finished with this.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : It remains for us to research from the perspective of knowledge.
The questioner : Knowledge.
The Shaykh : Correct?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh: Good.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.