(Explanation of Ibn al-Qayyim’s declaration of Ibn Sina as a disbeliever) And we say: Allah said, His Messenger said *** in every book and in every place, but you say: Aristotle said, and Ibn al-Khatib said, and the one of knowledge said
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : As for us, we say
"Allah said, His Messenger said *** in every book and in every place"
What Allah wills, we base our statements on the saying of Allah and His Messenger
"But you say: Aristotle said, and Ibn al-Khatib said, and the one of knowledge said
A Shaykh of yours is called Ibn Sina, who was not *** bound by religion and faith"
These are their Shaykhs, philosophers and atheists who are not bound by faith and are not bound by religion. This is one verse from several verses in which Ibn al-Qayyim, as well as his Shaykh, explicitly state that Ibn Sina is a disbeliever who has exited the religion. Even if some intellectuals consider him a believer, yes, but we say that he was a physician and excellent in medicine, but regarding religions, we see that those who transmitted from him regarding his disbelief, such as the Shaykh al-Islam and his student and others, we see that they are trustworthy and that their testimony against him is acceptable, yes.
"Allah said, His Messenger said *** in every book and in every place"
What Allah wills, we base our statements on the saying of Allah and His Messenger
"But you say: Aristotle said, and Ibn al-Khatib said, and the one of knowledge said
A Shaykh of yours is called Ibn Sina, who was not *** bound by religion and faith"
These are their Shaykhs, philosophers and atheists who are not bound by faith and are not bound by religion. This is one verse from several verses in which Ibn al-Qayyim, as well as his Shaykh, explicitly state that Ibn Sina is a disbeliever who has exited the religion. Even if some intellectuals consider him a believer, yes, but we say that he was a physician and excellent in medicine, but regarding religions, we see that those who transmitted from him regarding his disbelief, such as the Shaykh al-Islam and his student and others, we see that they are trustworthy and that their testimony against him is acceptable, yes.