The story is that a man was a hired worker for a person, and the man was a young man who had not married, so he committed zina with his wife, with a woman of whom?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : The story is that a man was a hired worker for a person, and the man was a young man who had not married, so he committed zina with his wife, with a woman of whom? The hired worker. So it was said to him that upon his son is stoning, so he ransomed him with one hundred sheep and a slave girl. The slave girl means the female slave, meaning he paid one hundred sheep and a slave so that his son would not be stoned. Then he asked men from the people of knowledge, and they informed him that upon his son is a hundred lashes and exile for one year, and upon the wife of the hired worker is stoning, because the one who committed zina was a virgin, and the one with whom he committed zina, O Nasser, here... is the wife of a man who is muhsan, and the one who committed zina was a virgin. So the Messenger (may Allah's prayer and peace be upon him) said: Sahih al-Bukhari 6827, 6828 meaning upon you, because it was taken without right, and what is taken without right must be returned to the one from whom it was taken, Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1433Sahih (Darussalam) a hundred lashes due to the saying of the Exalted: [An-Nur 24:2] and exile for one year by the Sunnah, for there is no exile in the Qur'an, but by the Sunnah, meaning he leaves his land for a period of one year. The benefit of this is that it distances him from the place of the one with whom he committed zina and from the one with whom he committed zina as well, because if he is near, perhaps his soul will be tempted to return again. Also, if he goes and is exiled, the stranger does not feel his chest open or his soul at ease, and his concern is himself, so he is distant from the circumstances that cause excitement and joy and the desire for intercourse, so in that is a protection for him from committing the forbidden act again. And based on that, it is not permissible to exile him to a country where corruption is prevalent, because if we exile him to a country where corruption is prevalent, we have only added to the trouble, so it is not permissible. But we send him to a pure country free from these evils.
