Explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "And some of that which is necessarily added, it is forbidden to follow it with an explicit noun where it occurs."
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : He said:
"And some of that which is necessarily added, it is forbidden to follow it with an explicit noun where it occurs"
This means: some of that which is necessarily added; "necessarily" means "obligatorily," meaning: some of that which must be added is forbidden to be followed by an explicit noun. This verse is the continuation of the first verse, meaning: among the nouns that are bound to be added, there are some that are not added to an explicit noun, that are not added to an explicit noun, that are not added to an explicit noun. We read the verse: "And some of that which is necessarily added". "Necessarily" is connected to what? To "added," yes. And his saying: "it is forbidden" is the predicate of "some," and the subject of "forbidden" is "its following". This is the subject of "forbidden," and "an explicit noun" is the object of "following," because it is a verbal noun that functions like its verb. "where it occurs" is connected to "its following," meaning, or connected to "forbidden," meaning: it is permissible that it is forbidden for an explicit noun to follow it, and it is bound to be added. The rule from this verse is: some of the nouns in which addition is mandatory are not added to an explicit noun, they are not added to an explicit noun, it is forbidden to add them to an explicit noun. What is the example?
"And some of that which is necessarily added, it is forbidden to follow it with an explicit noun where it occurs"
This means: some of that which is necessarily added; "necessarily" means "obligatorily," meaning: some of that which must be added is forbidden to be followed by an explicit noun. This verse is the continuation of the first verse, meaning: among the nouns that are bound to be added, there are some that are not added to an explicit noun, that are not added to an explicit noun, that are not added to an explicit noun. We read the verse: "And some of that which is necessarily added". "Necessarily" is connected to what? To "added," yes. And his saying: "it is forbidden" is the predicate of "some," and the subject of "forbidden" is "its following". This is the subject of "forbidden," and "an explicit noun" is the object of "following," because it is a verbal noun that functions like its verb. "where it occurs" is connected to "its following," meaning, or connected to "forbidden," meaning: it is permissible that it is forbidden for an explicit noun to follow it, and it is bound to be added. The rule from this verse is: some of the nouns in which addition is mandatory are not added to an explicit noun, they are not added to an explicit noun, it is forbidden to add them to an explicit noun. What is the example?