The discussion regarding the mixing of livestock.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Is the mixing, which is broader, the mixing or the partnership?
The questioner : The mixing is broader.
The Shaykh : The mixing is broader, why?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Okay, good, the scholars say that the mixing is divided into what?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Good, yes, what is the mixing of entities?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : ... I don't know who is answering, I only hear a voice, raise your hand if you are answering, raise your hand so I know who you are? Yes, good, glory be to Allah, I didn't recognize you, but yes?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : That is, the partnership of entities is that they share in the livestock on the basis of common ownership, meaning this one has half, this one has half, this one has a quarter, and this one has three quarters. Well done, the image of the issue, yes, as if two men inherit forty sheep, are they partners in a partnership?
The questioner : Entities.
The Shaykh : Good, what is the second type? The brother?
The questioner : The mixing of attributes.
The Shaykh : What is the mixing of attributes?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : That each one is distinguished from the other in his wealth, being independent of it, but they share?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : No, yes, but we mentioned that they share in five matters.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : In the pasture and the grazing ground.
The Shaykh : That they agree on the pasture.
The questioner : And that they agree on the stud.
The Shaykh : On the stud.
The questioner : And that they agree on the grazing ground.
The Shaykh : On the grazing ground.
The questioner : And in the night shelter.
The Shaykh : In the night shelter.
The questioner : And in the milking place.
The Shaykh : And the milking place, well done, five things, we recited a verse about them, I hope it is memorized.
The questioner : He has five years.
The Shaykh : Glory be to Allah, huh.
The questioner : Five years.
The Shaykh : How five years?
The questioner : The first explanation.
The Shaykh : The first explanation? Yes, good, who has it memorized? Yes?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, "If the stud, pasture, and grazing ground are agreed upon" this is the first half, "and the milking place and night shelter are certainly a mixing" yes, shall I repeat it a second time?
"If the stud, pasture, and grazing ground are agreed upon *** and the milking place and night shelter are certainly a mixing", and the third
"If the stud, pasture, and grazing ground are agreed upon *** and the milking place and night shelter are certainly a mixing", shall we recite it?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner :"If the stud, pasture, and grazing ground are agreed upon *** and the milking place".
The Shaykh :"and the milking place and night shelter" .
The questioner :"and the milking place and night shelter are certainly a mixing" .
The Shaykh : This, and we explained it previously, the stud is that neither of them is exclusive to a stud, the stud is shared between the two herds, the pasture is that the time of their going to the grazing ground is the same, the milking place is that the place of milking and its time are the same, and the grazing ground is that the place of grazing and its time are the same, the night shelter is that the overnight stay is the same throughout the year, good, if a disbeliever and a Muslim share? Muhammad shared in a partnership of attributes, is zakah obligatory on them?
The questioner : If it reaches the nisab.
The Shaykh : If it reaches a nisab, because the mixing with one who is not from the people of zakah is like non-existence, is there evidence indicating the mixing of attributes? Yes, Nasser?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Good, if a person has a nisab of sheep, half of it in al-Qasim and half of it in Riyadh, is zakah obligatory on it?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : One person, do you understand the question, a man has forty sheep, half of them in Riyadh and half of them in al-Qasim, is there zakah in them or not? Yes?
The questioner : Me.
The Shaykh : You, is there zakah in them?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : But twenty in Riyadh and twenty here.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : It does not harm, good, he hit the opinion of the majority, the three Imams and a narration from Ahmad, because the owner is one, good, the madhhab says that there is no zakah in them, because this is the meaning of his sayingSunan Abi Dawud 1580Hasan (Al-Albani), so that indicates that if his wealth is scattered, not for the sake of a ruse, then there is no zakah on him, but what appears, and is more cautious, is the opinion of the majority that zakah is obligatory on him, because the owner is one, and that one does not separate what is gathered, or does not gather what is scattered, when they are in a mixing of attributes, yes, I think we can take a break? We cannot, yes?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : The last one, it is known that if he has, for example, forty in Riyadh and twenty in al-Qasim, there is the zakah of the ones in Riyadh because they reached a nisab.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : The three Imams and a narration from Ahmad, Malik, al-Shafi'i, and Abu Hanifah say that there is zakah in them, because the owner is one.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : And the second opinion is the madhhab, the famous one from the Hanbali madhhab, that there is no zakah in them, ... I heard, the hadith of Abu BakrSunan Abi Dawud 1580Hasan (Al-Albani), yes.
The questioner : The mixing is broader.
The Shaykh : The mixing is broader, why?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Okay, good, the scholars say that the mixing is divided into what?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Good, yes, what is the mixing of entities?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : ... I don't know who is answering, I only hear a voice, raise your hand if you are answering, raise your hand so I know who you are? Yes, good, glory be to Allah, I didn't recognize you, but yes?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : That is, the partnership of entities is that they share in the livestock on the basis of common ownership, meaning this one has half, this one has half, this one has a quarter, and this one has three quarters. Well done, the image of the issue, yes, as if two men inherit forty sheep, are they partners in a partnership?
The questioner : Entities.
The Shaykh : Good, what is the second type? The brother?
The questioner : The mixing of attributes.
The Shaykh : What is the mixing of attributes?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : That each one is distinguished from the other in his wealth, being independent of it, but they share?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : No, yes, but we mentioned that they share in five matters.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : In the pasture and the grazing ground.
The Shaykh : That they agree on the pasture.
The questioner : And that they agree on the stud.
The Shaykh : On the stud.
The questioner : And that they agree on the grazing ground.
The Shaykh : On the grazing ground.
The questioner : And in the night shelter.
The Shaykh : In the night shelter.
The questioner : And in the milking place.
The Shaykh : And the milking place, well done, five things, we recited a verse about them, I hope it is memorized.
The questioner : He has five years.
The Shaykh : Glory be to Allah, huh.
The questioner : Five years.
The Shaykh : How five years?
The questioner : The first explanation.
The Shaykh : The first explanation? Yes, good, who has it memorized? Yes?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, "If the stud, pasture, and grazing ground are agreed upon" this is the first half, "and the milking place and night shelter are certainly a mixing" yes, shall I repeat it a second time?
"If the stud, pasture, and grazing ground are agreed upon *** and the milking place and night shelter are certainly a mixing", and the third
"If the stud, pasture, and grazing ground are agreed upon *** and the milking place and night shelter are certainly a mixing", shall we recite it?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner :"If the stud, pasture, and grazing ground are agreed upon *** and the milking place".
The Shaykh :"and the milking place and night shelter" .
The questioner :"and the milking place and night shelter are certainly a mixing" .
The Shaykh : This, and we explained it previously, the stud is that neither of them is exclusive to a stud, the stud is shared between the two herds, the pasture is that the time of their going to the grazing ground is the same, the milking place is that the place of milking and its time are the same, and the grazing ground is that the place of grazing and its time are the same, the night shelter is that the overnight stay is the same throughout the year, good, if a disbeliever and a Muslim share? Muhammad shared in a partnership of attributes, is zakah obligatory on them?
The questioner : If it reaches the nisab.
The Shaykh : If it reaches a nisab, because the mixing with one who is not from the people of zakah is like non-existence, is there evidence indicating the mixing of attributes? Yes, Nasser?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Good, if a person has a nisab of sheep, half of it in al-Qasim and half of it in Riyadh, is zakah obligatory on it?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : One person, do you understand the question, a man has forty sheep, half of them in Riyadh and half of them in al-Qasim, is there zakah in them or not? Yes?
The questioner : Me.
The Shaykh : You, is there zakah in them?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : But twenty in Riyadh and twenty here.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : It does not harm, good, he hit the opinion of the majority, the three Imams and a narration from Ahmad, because the owner is one, good, the madhhab says that there is no zakah in them, because this is the meaning of his saying
nor were they to be separated for fear of zakat
لا يُفرّق بين مجتمع خشية الصّدقةThe questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : The last one, it is known that if he has, for example, forty in Riyadh and twenty in al-Qasim, there is the zakah of the ones in Riyadh because they reached a nisab.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : The three Imams and a narration from Ahmad, Malik, al-Shafi'i, and Abu Hanifah say that there is zakah in them, because the owner is one.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : And the second opinion is the madhhab, the famous one from the Hanbali madhhab, that there is no zakah in them, ... I heard, the hadith of Abu Bakr