If al-'Ujli and Ibn Hibban agree to classify a man as trustworthy, and no one else has done so, is he considered trustworthy or not?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner: Shaykh, regarding...
Another questioner: Al-'Ujli and Ibn Hibban, along with some of the others...
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner: If al-'Ujli and Ibn Hibban classify a man as trustworthy, and no one else has done so except them, is their classification accepted or not?
The Shaykh: Who are they?
The questioner: Al-'Ujli and Ibn Hibban.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: They classified a man as trustworthy; is the classification of the two together accepted?
The Shaykh: Like some of the others, if he is unknown to the rest.
The questioner: Meaning their classification is not accepted? If he is unknown, that is.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: Classifying an unknown person.
The Shaykh: There is no difference whether one of them did it alone or the other joined him.
The questioner: Shaykh, regarding...
Another questioner: Al-'Ujli and Ibn Hibban, along with some of the others...
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner: If al-'Ujli and Ibn Hibban classify a man as trustworthy, and no one else has done so except them, is their classification accepted or not?
The Shaykh: Who are they?
The questioner: Al-'Ujli and Ibn Hibban.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: They classified a man as trustworthy; is the classification of the two together accepted?
The Shaykh: Like some of the others, if he is unknown to the rest.
The questioner: Meaning their classification is not accepted? If he is unknown, that is.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: Classifying an unknown person.
The Shaykh: There is no difference whether one of them did it alone or the other joined him.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.
