Is the well-known matter in which the judge rules based on his knowledge limited to endowments only?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Regarding the second case, outside of endowments?
The Shaykh : What is it? No, no, this is an example. An example where the matter is not yet complete. It is the property of so-and-so, it is well-known, and there is no doubt about it.
The questioner : It changes, for example.
The Shaykh : If it changes, we say: "Evidence is required." We say: "Evidence is required." It does not contradict the well-known fact that this is the property of so-and-so. Evidence is required that it has transferred to you.
The questioner : If he has evidence, does he rule?
The Shaykh : Of course, if there is evidence, he rules.
The questioner : Regarding the second case, outside of endowments?
The Shaykh : What is it? No, no, this is an example. An example where the matter is not yet complete. It is the property of so-and-so, it is well-known, and there is no doubt about it.
The questioner : It changes, for example.
The Shaykh : If it changes, we say: "Evidence is required." We say: "Evidence is required." It does not contradict the well-known fact that this is the property of so-and-so. Evidence is required that it has transferred to you.
The questioner : If he has evidence, does he rule?
The Shaykh : Of course, if there is evidence, he rules.