A woman wears a silver chain with a piece of gold on it; is this permissible?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : A woman wears a silver chain with a piece of gold on it.
The Shaykh : A woman wears.
The questioner : She wears a silver chain.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : And it has a piece of gold on it.
The Shaykh : Pardon me.
The questioner : I mean a silver necklace, Shaykh.
The Shaykh : A piece of gold hanging, meaning on the chain.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Or how do you mean?
The questioner : A piece of gold inside.
The Shaykh : The chain.
The questioner : Inside the chain.
The Shaykh : I mean, for example, the necklace is silver and there is a gold piece.
The questioner : A heart, for example.
The Shaykh : Like this.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes, there is nothing wrong with that; because the consideration is for the predominant part, and the predominant part is that it is a silver necklace.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : And not a gold necklace, is that clear?
The questioner : Of course, it is not counted as a gold necklace.
The Shaykh : Answer me, is that clear?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : So that we can take a turn for someone else.
The questioner : And if the predominant part in this necklace is gold.
The Shaykh : The opposite of the opposite, it would be forbidden.
The questioner : Our Shaykh, it is not counted as a gold necklace, it is not counted as this being silver.
The Shaykh : With this last one, otherwise did you hear what he said? May Allah forgive you.
The questioner : An Egyptian brother wants to learn the science of hadith, and he is married and supports three.
The Shaykh : Come on, go ahead, make a fuss.
The Shaykh : A woman wears.
The questioner : She wears a silver chain.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : And it has a piece of gold on it.
The Shaykh : Pardon me.
The questioner : I mean a silver necklace, Shaykh.
The Shaykh : A piece of gold hanging, meaning on the chain.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Or how do you mean?
The questioner : A piece of gold inside.
The Shaykh : The chain.
The questioner : Inside the chain.
The Shaykh : I mean, for example, the necklace is silver and there is a gold piece.
The questioner : A heart, for example.
The Shaykh : Like this.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes, there is nothing wrong with that; because the consideration is for the predominant part, and the predominant part is that it is a silver necklace.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : And not a gold necklace, is that clear?
The questioner : Of course, it is not counted as a gold necklace.
The Shaykh : Answer me, is that clear?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : So that we can take a turn for someone else.
The questioner : And if the predominant part in this necklace is gold.
The Shaykh : The opposite of the opposite, it would be forbidden.
The questioner : Our Shaykh, it is not counted as a gold necklace, it is not counted as this being silver.
The Shaykh : With this last one, otherwise did you hear what he said? May Allah forgive you.
The questioner : An Egyptian brother wants to learn the science of hadith, and he is married and supports three.
The Shaykh : Come on, go ahead, make a fuss.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.