The Ruling on Melodizing and Elongating in the Adhan
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
It is observed that many mu'adhdhins elongate the adhan, and guidance is requested?
Answer: The believer should be moderate in his adhan, neither elongating it nor being affected by it, and likewise in the iqamah. The sunnah in this is that he does not melodize in it, and that he also protects it from melodizing; he does not melodize and does not melodize. Melodizing is when he disrupts the grammar, such as saying: "I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah" (with the lam of "Muhammad" in the open state), whereas the prescribed way is to say: "that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah"; because "Messenger of Allah" is the predicate of "that" and is in the nominative case, so if he puts it in the accusative case, it is a grammatical error, even if it does not actually disrupt the meaning; because the mu'adhdhin's intention is to inform that he is the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him); and because some linguists put the two objects in the accusative case, but this is a grammatical error according to the majority of the masters of language and the majority of the Arabs. The Arabs put the name in the accusative case and the predicate in the nominative case in "that." Also, it is a grammatical error to say, for example: "Guide us to the straight path"; he breaks the kasrah, this is a mistake, because it is an object in the accusative case (the path), but it does not disrupt the meaning, it does not disrupt the meaning, so it does not harm in the adhan if he says, for example: "Hasten to prayer," or "Hasten to prayer," it does not disrupt the meaning, but he should be an understanding Arab who does not make grammatical errors in the adhan. As for melodizing, it is elongating it as if he is singing, this is disliked and should not be done. Yes.
The presenter: May Allah reward you.
Answer: The believer should be moderate in his adhan, neither elongating it nor being affected by it, and likewise in the iqamah. The sunnah in this is that he does not melodize in it, and that he also protects it from melodizing; he does not melodize and does not melodize. Melodizing is when he disrupts the grammar, such as saying: "I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah" (with the lam of "Muhammad" in the open state), whereas the prescribed way is to say: "that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah"; because "Messenger of Allah" is the predicate of "that" and is in the nominative case, so if he puts it in the accusative case, it is a grammatical error, even if it does not actually disrupt the meaning; because the mu'adhdhin's intention is to inform that he is the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him); and because some linguists put the two objects in the accusative case, but this is a grammatical error according to the majority of the masters of language and the majority of the Arabs. The Arabs put the name in the accusative case and the predicate in the nominative case in "that." Also, it is a grammatical error to say, for example: "Guide us to the straight path"; he breaks the kasrah, this is a mistake, because it is an object in the accusative case (the path), but it does not disrupt the meaning, it does not disrupt the meaning, so it does not harm in the adhan if he says, for example: "Hasten to prayer," or "Hasten to prayer," it does not disrupt the meaning, but he should be an understanding Arab who does not make grammatical errors in the adhan. As for melodizing, it is elongating it as if he is singing, this is disliked and should not be done. Yes.
The presenter: May Allah reward you.
Source
binbaz.org.sa
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.
