Is it correct to say: Whoever shows off in the entire prayer, his deed is invalid, and whoever shows off in adorning the recitation, only its reward is invalid?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
He says: Honorable Shaykh, may Allah grant you success, is this distinction correct regarding minor shirk (associating partners with Allah) in terms of invalidating the deed? For example, if one shows off in the entire prayer, his deed and his prayer are invalid, and if he shows off in adorning the recitation or prolonging the prayer, only the reward of the deed is invalid. Is this correct?
Answer:
This is what we have known from the words of the scholars. All of riya' (showing off in worship), in all its types, is not permissible and it invalidates the deed that it mixed with. Yes.
He says: Honorable Shaykh, may Allah grant you success, is this distinction correct regarding minor shirk (associating partners with Allah) in terms of invalidating the deed? For example, if one shows off in the entire prayer, his deed and his prayer are invalid, and if he shows off in adorning the recitation or prolonging the prayer, only the reward of the deed is invalid. Is this correct?
Answer:
This is what we have known from the words of the scholars. All of riya' (showing off in worship), in all its types, is not permissible and it invalidates the deed that it mixed with. Yes.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، [212 -521] هل يصح القول: من راءى في الصلاة كلها بطل عمله، ومن راءى في تزيين القراءة بطل ثوابها فقط؟ — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.