Discussion on the conditions of tayammum
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : He distinguishes that soil is soil and sand is sand. Not everything that is like stone is this.
The Shaykh : No, no, the soil is that from which clay is made, the soil from which clay is made, even if the sand has dust in it, it is not suitable.
The questioner : Did you hear me, Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Except according to the madhhab, if he intended only the dust, yes.
The questioner : If he performed tayammum for an obligatory prayer, of course he prays all the obligatory and voluntary prayers, but does he recite the Qur'an?
The Shaykh : Yes, the rule with them is that whoever intends the higher, he is permitted what is below it, and not the reverse.
The questioner : But now he intended what he is performing tayammum for, he performed tayammum for it, which is the prayer, and he did not intend to recite it.
The Shaykh : Reciting the Qur'an is among what one performs tayammum for, among what one performs tayammum for.
The questioner : Abu Yisam is forgiving. Ha.
The Shaykh : It does not contradict, just as if he performed tayammum for prayer, he would circumambulate with it, and pray the funeral prayer, and prostrate for recitation,
The questioner : Okay.
The Shaykh : We must condition what one performs tayammum for, we do not condition what one performs tayammum for on this, they condition it, they said and they condition that they resolve.
The questioner : The intention.
The Shaykh : The intention for what one performs tayammum for, yes, from a state of ritual impurity.
The questioner : From a state of ritual impurity. Correct?
The Shaykh : What one performs tayammum with and what one performs tayammum for.
The questioner : Yes, but they said if he intends the higher, the lower is included in it.
The Shaykh : Even if it is Maghrib.
The questioner : Even if it is of a different type, and not the reverse.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Their argumentation with the verse. Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes, but Brother 'A'id says that arguing with the verse necessitates that if he performed tayammum with clay and was unable,
The questioner : The hadith refutes it. With them, the hadith refutes it.
The Shaykh : Yes, with them, but with their argumentation with the verse, my intention, Brother 'A'id's intention with their argumentation with the verse?
The questioner : When the evidence comes together, if you condition soil, he says I must buy soil and it.
The Shaykh : In reality, his statement is to obligate them, and if you say that "min" is for partiality, and the intended meaning is that some of what one performs tayammum with is on his face, he says it obligates you to say this, that he performs tayammum, he takes the sticky clay once, strikes his hands, and smears his face, yes, so we say this is correct and obligatory for them, but in reality the Sunnah refutes it, and what indicates its refutation is that the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) blew on his hands, in the hadith of 'Amir in al-Bukhari he blew on them, and this is also evidence that the intended meaning of that is not for a person to dust his face with soil, is this not the necessary implication?
The Shaykh : No, no, the soil is that from which clay is made, the soil from which clay is made, even if the sand has dust in it, it is not suitable.
The questioner : Did you hear me, Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Except according to the madhhab, if he intended only the dust, yes.
The questioner : If he performed tayammum for an obligatory prayer, of course he prays all the obligatory and voluntary prayers, but does he recite the Qur'an?
The Shaykh : Yes, the rule with them is that whoever intends the higher, he is permitted what is below it, and not the reverse.
The questioner : But now he intended what he is performing tayammum for, he performed tayammum for it, which is the prayer, and he did not intend to recite it.
The Shaykh : Reciting the Qur'an is among what one performs tayammum for, among what one performs tayammum for.
The questioner : Abu Yisam is forgiving. Ha.
The Shaykh : It does not contradict, just as if he performed tayammum for prayer, he would circumambulate with it, and pray the funeral prayer, and prostrate for recitation,
The questioner : Okay.
The Shaykh : We must condition what one performs tayammum for, we do not condition what one performs tayammum for on this, they condition it, they said and they condition that they resolve.
The questioner : The intention.
The Shaykh : The intention for what one performs tayammum for, yes, from a state of ritual impurity.
The questioner : From a state of ritual impurity. Correct?
The Shaykh : What one performs tayammum with and what one performs tayammum for.
The questioner : Yes, but they said if he intends the higher, the lower is included in it.
The Shaykh : Even if it is Maghrib.
The questioner : Even if it is of a different type, and not the reverse.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Their argumentation with the verse. Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes, but Brother 'A'id says that arguing with the verse necessitates that if he performed tayammum with clay and was unable,
The questioner : The hadith refutes it. With them, the hadith refutes it.
The Shaykh : Yes, with them, but with their argumentation with the verse, my intention, Brother 'A'id's intention with their argumentation with the verse?
The questioner : When the evidence comes together, if you condition soil, he says I must buy soil and it.
The Shaykh : In reality, his statement is to obligate them, and if you say that "min" is for partiality, and the intended meaning is that some of what one performs tayammum with is on his face, he says it obligates you to say this, that he performs tayammum, he takes the sticky clay once, strikes his hands, and smears his face, yes, so we say this is correct and obligatory for them, but in reality the Sunnah refutes it, and what indicates its refutation is that the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) blew on his hands, in the hadith of 'Amir in al-Bukhari he blew on them, and this is also evidence that the intended meaning of that is not for a person to dust his face with soil, is this not the necessary implication?
Source
قناة «فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن صالح العثيمين»، 653مناقشة في فروض التيمم📔 الشرح الممتع على زاد المستقنع - ابن عثيمين - مشروع كبار العلماء — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.