The ruling on wiping over a perforated leather sock and wearing them consecutively
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Ya Ala. My upper leather sock is perforated, my upper leather sock is perforated, my upper leather sock is fine, so it is not in the form of an upper leather sock, and we consider that it does not come out of you.
The Shaykh : No, they hold that it is valid even if the upper one is perforated, and wiping over it is permissible. This supports the second opinion that these two leather socks are in the position of a single leather sock, and that they are like the outer layer and the inner layer.
The questioner : The outer layer and the inner layer, both are considered when the leather sock is...
The Shaykh : No, my brother, it is not a matter of two layers, do you know the *zarbun*?
The questioner : Yes, yes, yes.
The Shaykh : Do you know the *zarbun*? It covers the whole thing. Yes, the outer layer is only on the top of the foot. It is called the *zarbun*. This exists even in the language of the jurists; the jurists say *zarbun*. The *zarbun* is not the *zanbur*, yes.
The questioner : This is not denied.
The Shaykh : Huh? No, no, no. *Zarabil* refers to wool, woven wool to the size of the foot, and this wool is worn with a layer of skin on top and layers of skin on the bottom, like the layers of sandals, and it is sewn. It comes out.
The questioner : Our father, soldiers from the canal, from the canal only from Paradise.
The Shaykh : No, no, this is something else, they call them *jarabat*, they call them *jarabat* with us, a *jarab*, whereas the *zarbun* is what I described to you. So if, for example, we have...? It comes out of the wool and a layer of skin is put on top and a layer of skin on the bottom, like the layers of sandals, yes, is that correct?
The questioner : He wore them, then wiped, then wore another pair, so what is the ruling?
The Shaykh : The ruling according to the school of thought is based on the lower one. According to the school of thought, if you wipe something, the ruling attaches to it, whether it is the upper or the lower. And according to the second opinion, they say that as long as there is no impurity or ritual purity, there is no harm in wiping over the upper one. Yes.
The Shaykh : No, they hold that it is valid even if the upper one is perforated, and wiping over it is permissible. This supports the second opinion that these two leather socks are in the position of a single leather sock, and that they are like the outer layer and the inner layer.
The questioner : The outer layer and the inner layer, both are considered when the leather sock is...
The Shaykh : No, my brother, it is not a matter of two layers, do you know the *zarbun*?
The questioner : Yes, yes, yes.
The Shaykh : Do you know the *zarbun*? It covers the whole thing. Yes, the outer layer is only on the top of the foot. It is called the *zarbun*. This exists even in the language of the jurists; the jurists say *zarbun*. The *zarbun* is not the *zanbur*, yes.
The questioner : This is not denied.
The Shaykh : Huh? No, no, no. *Zarabil* refers to wool, woven wool to the size of the foot, and this wool is worn with a layer of skin on top and layers of skin on the bottom, like the layers of sandals, and it is sewn. It comes out.
The questioner : Our father, soldiers from the canal, from the canal only from Paradise.
The Shaykh : No, no, this is something else, they call them *jarabat*, they call them *jarabat* with us, a *jarab*, whereas the *zarbun* is what I described to you. So if, for example, we have...? It comes out of the wool and a layer of skin is put on top and a layer of skin on the bottom, like the layers of sandals, yes, is that correct?
The questioner : He wore them, then wiped, then wore another pair, so what is the ruling?
The Shaykh : The ruling according to the school of thought is based on the lower one. According to the school of thought, if you wipe something, the ruling attaches to it, whether it is the upper or the lower. And according to the second opinion, they say that as long as there is no impurity or ritual purity, there is no harm in wiping over the upper one. Yes.
Source
قناة «فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن صالح العثيمين»، 391مناقشة في الخف المخرق والخف...📔 الشرح الممتع على زاد المستقنع - ابن عثيمين - مشروع كبار العلماء — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.
