A man was struck by a heatstroke at 'Arafah and went to the hospital; is his Hajj valid, and what is required of him?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Peace be upon you.
The Shaykh : Peace be upon you.
The questioner : May Allah keep you in good health, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : May Allah keep you in good health.
The questioner : In your question, may Allah prolong your life, there is a man who came for Hajj, and while standing at 'Arafah, he was struck by a heatstroke at 'Arafah and was admitted to the hospital. He was unable to stone the Jamarat al-Aqabah, nor the remaining pillars, nor the remaining rites. So what is required of him, and is his Hajj valid?
The Shaykh : As long as he stood at 'Arafah, his Hajj is valid. Did he perform the tawaf or not?
The questioner : No, he did not.
The Shaykh : He did not follow at all.
The questioner : The door, the door of arrival.
The Shaykh : Did he perform the tawaf of arrival, or the tawaf of ifadah, the tawaf of Hajj? No, and no sa'y?
The questioner : And no sa'y.
The Shaykh : Meaning, he exited the state of ihram.
The questioner : Because he stayed in the hospital for a period.
The Shaykh : And he exited the state of ihram, or did he not?
The questioner : He exited the state of ihram.
The Shaykh : He exited the state of ihram. Okay, did he say when he entered the state of ihram, "If I am prevented, then I am released," or "I am prevented"?
The questioner : No, he did not say it.
The Shaykh : He did not say it. The correct ruling is that he owes a sacrificial animal because he was prevented from completing the Hajj. Yes.
The questioner : Is the sacrificial animal for all the rites, or is it a sacrificial animal for each rite?
The Shaykh : No, he exits the state of ihram with a sacrificial animal, and he repeats the Hajj from the beginning.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : If he had not exited the state of ihram, we would say he should now perform the tawaf of ifadah and the sa'y, and he would owe a sacrificial animal for leaving the standing until night, another sacrificial animal for leaving the overnight stay at Muzdalifah, a third sacrificial animal for leaving the stoning of the pillars, and a fourth sacrificial animal for leaving the overnight stay at Mina, and then he would complete his Hajj. But you say that the man intended to exit the state of ihram due to this excuse, and the correct ruling is that the exit from the state of ihram occurs
The questioner : Meaning,
The Shaykh : and the like, and that being prevented is not specific to an enemy.
The questioner : Meaning, if he, for example, traveled to Egypt, for example, is he required to return again?
The Shaykh : If this Hajj is the obligatory one, he must perform it.
The questioner : He returns again.
The Shaykh : Yes, he performs Hajj again.
The Shaykh : Peace be upon you.
The questioner : May Allah keep you in good health, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : May Allah keep you in good health.
The questioner : In your question, may Allah prolong your life, there is a man who came for Hajj, and while standing at 'Arafah, he was struck by a heatstroke at 'Arafah and was admitted to the hospital. He was unable to stone the Jamarat al-Aqabah, nor the remaining pillars, nor the remaining rites. So what is required of him, and is his Hajj valid?
The Shaykh : As long as he stood at 'Arafah, his Hajj is valid. Did he perform the tawaf or not?
The questioner : No, he did not.
The Shaykh : He did not follow at all.
The questioner : The door, the door of arrival.
The Shaykh : Did he perform the tawaf of arrival, or the tawaf of ifadah, the tawaf of Hajj? No, and no sa'y?
The questioner : And no sa'y.
The Shaykh : Meaning, he exited the state of ihram.
The questioner : Because he stayed in the hospital for a period.
The Shaykh : And he exited the state of ihram, or did he not?
The questioner : He exited the state of ihram.
The Shaykh : He exited the state of ihram. Okay, did he say when he entered the state of ihram, "If I am prevented, then I am released," or "I am prevented"?
The questioner : No, he did not say it.
The Shaykh : He did not say it. The correct ruling is that he owes a sacrificial animal because he was prevented from completing the Hajj. Yes.
The questioner : Is the sacrificial animal for all the rites, or is it a sacrificial animal for each rite?
The Shaykh : No, he exits the state of ihram with a sacrificial animal, and he repeats the Hajj from the beginning.
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : If he had not exited the state of ihram, we would say he should now perform the tawaf of ifadah and the sa'y, and he would owe a sacrificial animal for leaving the standing until night, another sacrificial animal for leaving the overnight stay at Muzdalifah, a third sacrificial animal for leaving the stoning of the pillars, and a fourth sacrificial animal for leaving the overnight stay at Mina, and then he would complete his Hajj. But you say that the man intended to exit the state of ihram due to this excuse, and the correct ruling is that the exit from the state of ihram occurs
The questioner : Meaning,
The Shaykh : and the like, and that being prevented is not specific to an enemy.
The questioner : Meaning, if he, for example, traveled to Egypt, for example, is he required to return again?
The Shaykh : If this Hajj is the obligatory one, he must perform it.
The questioner : He returns again.
The Shaykh : Yes, he performs Hajj again.
Source
قناة «فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن صالح العثيمين»، 112- رجل اصيب بضربة شمس في عرفة وذهب للمستشفى هل حجه صحيح وماذا عليه📍سؤال من حاج 🕋 📍 — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.