The ruling on one who passes by the miqat of Yalamlam intending to perform 'Umrah but does not enter the state of ihram, then enters ihram from the miqat of the people of Ta'if

Question:
A questioner says: A man traveled from Jazan and passed by the miqat of Yalamlam, intending to perform 'Umrah, but he did not enter the state of ihram. He stopped in Ta'if. Does he enter the state of ihram from the miqat of the people of Ta'if?

Answer:
If he came intending for Ta'if, intending for Ta'if, and did not intend for Makkah, but only intended for Ta'if, then his ruling is the ruling of the people of Ta'if: he enters the state of ihram from the miqat of Sayl or from Wadi Mahram. But if he came intending for Makkah and passed by Yalamlam, it is obligatory for him to enter the state of ihram. [The verse states:] "And [enter the state of ihram] for those who come to them from among their people who intend Hajj or 'Umrah." So he enters the state of ihram. And if he wants to go to Ta'if or Jeddah, he goes while in the state of ihram. He goes while in the state of ihram, and he does not pass the miqat without entering the state of ihram, while intending 'Umrah. Yes.