2802 The ruling on one who leaves the miqat without entering the state of ihram

Question:
He says: Honorable Shaykh, may Allah grant you success. The questioner says: I came from Egypt to work in Riyadh, and it was two weeks before the Hajj season. So I headed directly to Makkah and did not come to Riyadh. I stayed in Makkah, then went out to al-Tan'īm, so I entered the state of ihram for 'Umrah, then came out of it, and combined it with Hajj. Is my action valid? Or was it necessary for me to go out to the miqat? When you came from Egypt, you intended 'Umrah

Answer:
and Hajj. It is obligatory for you to enter the state of ihram from the miqat for 'Umrah when you pass by it. As for if you passed by without intending Hajj or 'Umrah, and then you intended it in Makkah and went out to al-Tan'īm, there is no harm. But what you did now, or that you came from Egypt for 'Umrah and said you had time, and you entered Makkah and stayed in it without entering the state of ihram from the miqat, your 'Umrah is valid and your tamattu' is valid, but you owe a fidyah (ransom payment) for leaving the miqat. Yes.