The Difference Between Narration, Takhrij, and the Position in the School
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
Allah informs you: If one of the Companions reached Ramadan to this extent, is it the tools of this extent?
The Shaykh:
A preference (tarjih) does not count as a position (wajh). Preferring a statement or a narration from the Imam does not count as creating a new statement. The position (wajh) is what was not from the Imam's speech. Takhraj is what we have: the narration is one thing, we have takhraj, and we have the position. The narration is what was from the Imam's speech. Takhraj is what is derived based on the Imam's rules; the Imam did not say it, but it is derived based on his rules. This is called takhraj.
The position (wajh) is what was from the statement of one of the Companions, not from the Imam's speech, and not a takhraj based on his rule, but rather a statement that a scholar from the scholars of the school innovated, in which he exerted independent legal reasoning (ijtihad).
The questioner:
A portion.
The Shaykh:
No, takhraj is derived from the Imam's speech; it is derived, meaning it is analogized based on the Imam's speech. As for the position (wajh), his Companions exerted independent legal reasoning in it. Yes.
The questioner:
The Companions of the first [generation] are the majority of the wisdom.
The Shaykh:
The Companions of the school, meaning the Companions of the school.
The questioner:
Among them, those who were contemporaries.
The Shaykh:
If they reached the rank of independent legal reasoning (ijtihad), the contemporaries, if they reached the rank of his own independent legal reasoning, they are called from among the Companions, even if it is himself.
The questioner:
And they became walking, they became.
The Shaykh:
If they are beginners, they are not considered. Yes.
Allah informs you: If one of the Companions reached Ramadan to this extent, is it the tools of this extent?
The Shaykh:
A preference (tarjih) does not count as a position (wajh). Preferring a statement or a narration from the Imam does not count as creating a new statement. The position (wajh) is what was not from the Imam's speech. Takhraj is what we have: the narration is one thing, we have takhraj, and we have the position. The narration is what was from the Imam's speech. Takhraj is what is derived based on the Imam's rules; the Imam did not say it, but it is derived based on his rules. This is called takhraj.
The position (wajh) is what was from the statement of one of the Companions, not from the Imam's speech, and not a takhraj based on his rule, but rather a statement that a scholar from the scholars of the school innovated, in which he exerted independent legal reasoning (ijtihad).
The questioner:
A portion.
The Shaykh:
No, takhraj is derived from the Imam's speech; it is derived, meaning it is analogized based on the Imam's speech. As for the position (wajh), his Companions exerted independent legal reasoning in it. Yes.
The questioner:
The Companions of the first [generation] are the majority of the wisdom.
The Shaykh:
The Companions of the school, meaning the Companions of the school.
The questioner:
Among them, those who were contemporaries.
The Shaykh:
If they reached the rank of independent legal reasoning (ijtihad), the contemporaries, if they reached the rank of his own independent legal reasoning, they are called from among the Companions, even if it is himself.
The questioner:
And they became walking, they became.
The Shaykh:
If they are beginners, they are not considered. Yes.
Source
ترجيح أحد الأصحاب رأيا خلاف المذهب — alfawzan.live
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.
