The Ruling on Prohibition in the Chapter of Etiquette
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. Doctor, Shaykh, is there a hadith of Qatadah in the chapter of mutual compassion and tracing? And is there a chapter on grammar in the empty space regarding half of laziness, holding fast, and denial? Or is the prohibition different among these states?
Answer:
The prohibition is for dislike. They say the prohibition is for dislike in all these matters. The prohibition is not for prohibition, but rather for dislike, because these matters are among the etiquettes that should be, that should be acted upon.
And the matters within the scope of etiquette, the command in them is for recommendation and the prohibition in them is for dislike, so that it does not become as if it is a rule with them. Whatever is from the chapter of etiquette, the command in it is for recommendation and the prohibition is for dislike. Good.
Otherwise, if we proceeded according to the apparent meaning, the apparent meaning is impossible, and some of the scholars hold that it is impossible. Therefore, al-Bukhari (may Allah have mercy on him) titled the chapter "The Prohibition of Such and Such," and did not say "The Prohibition of Such and Such" as a prohibition of sin. He said "The Prohibition of Such and Such," and did not say "The Prohibition of Such and Such" as a prohibition of sin, because this prohibition is inclusive. This is from his precision (may Allah have mercy on him). Yes.
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. Doctor, Shaykh, is there a hadith of Qatadah in the chapter of mutual compassion and tracing? And is there a chapter on grammar in the empty space regarding half of laziness, holding fast, and denial? Or is the prohibition different among these states?
Answer:
The prohibition is for dislike. They say the prohibition is for dislike in all these matters. The prohibition is not for prohibition, but rather for dislike, because these matters are among the etiquettes that should be, that should be acted upon.
And the matters within the scope of etiquette, the command in them is for recommendation and the prohibition in them is for dislike, so that it does not become as if it is a rule with them. Whatever is from the chapter of etiquette, the command in it is for recommendation and the prohibition is for dislike. Good.
Otherwise, if we proceeded according to the apparent meaning, the apparent meaning is impossible, and some of the scholars hold that it is impossible. Therefore, al-Bukhari (may Allah have mercy on him) titled the chapter "The Prohibition of Such and Such," and did not say "The Prohibition of Such and Such" as a prohibition of sin. He said "The Prohibition of Such and Such," and did not say "The Prohibition of Such and Such" as a prohibition of sin, because this prohibition is inclusive. This is from his precision (may Allah have mercy on him). Yes.