The ruling on one who passes the miqat without entering ihram

Question:
The questioner also asks: What is your opinion, Honorable Shaykh, regarding the one who says that the one who passes the miqat owes a sacrificial animal, even if he did not intend it?

Answer:
If he passed the miqat without intending it, and only intended it afterwards, there is no harm. As for the one who came from his country intending to perform 'Umrah, then passed the miqat, he owes a sacrificial animal for passing the miqat, if he did not enter the state of ihram except from a place before the miqat while he was intending 'Umrah. For example, if he came from Riyadh and did not enter ihram except from al-Tan'eem, he owes a sacrificial animal, and he was intending 'Umrah when he arrived. Or if he came from Egypt and passed the miqat of al-Rabigh, but did not enter ihram except from Jeddah, he owes a sacrificial animal, or something like that. Everyone who comes intending 'Umrah or Hajj and then passes the miqat owes a sacrificial animal. This is the correct position, as mentioned previously.

The presenter:
May Allah reward you with good,