The fidyah of one who passed the miqat without entering ihram and without removing sewn garments
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
Honorable Shaykh, a questioner says: A man passed the miqat intending to perform Hajj, but he did not enter ihram from the miqat and did not wear the clothes of ihram.
The Shaykh:
A man.
The questioner:
A man passed the miqat intending to perform Hajj. He did not enter ihram from the miqat, and he did not wear the clothes of ihram. He entered ihram from Makkah. One person told him that he owes a fidyah for that, and another told him that he owes two fidyahs: one for not entering ihram from the miqat, and one for wearing sewn garments. A third told him that he owes three fidyahs, adding a third fidyah for covering the head. Which of these is correct?
The Shaykh:
Yes, all of this is correct. If he passed the miqat intending to perform Hajj and did not enter ihram, he left an obligatory duty, which is entering ihram from the miqat. He passed by wearing his clothes while intending to enter ihram. If he intended to enter ihram after passing the miqat, he intended it but did not remove the clothes. He did not remove the clothes, so he owes a second fidyah for the clothes, and he also owes a fidyah for covering the head from the time he intends to enter ihram. As long as he has not yet intended to enter ihram, he owes nothing except the first fidyah, which is for passing the miqat without entering ihram. His passing the miqat while intending to perform Hajj and not entering ihram establishes a fidyah for him, unless he returns before entering ihram. If he returns and enters ihram from the miqat, he owes nothing. But if he goes on and does not enter ihram until after passing the miqat or reaching Makkah, then from the time he intends to enter ihram, he must remove the sewn garments and wear the izar and rida. If he does not remove them, he owes two fidyahs: one for the sewn garment on the body and one for covering the head.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you,
Honorable Shaykh, a questioner says: A man passed the miqat intending to perform Hajj, but he did not enter ihram from the miqat and did not wear the clothes of ihram.
The Shaykh:
A man.
The questioner:
A man passed the miqat intending to perform Hajj. He did not enter ihram from the miqat, and he did not wear the clothes of ihram. He entered ihram from Makkah. One person told him that he owes a fidyah for that, and another told him that he owes two fidyahs: one for not entering ihram from the miqat, and one for wearing sewn garments. A third told him that he owes three fidyahs, adding a third fidyah for covering the head. Which of these is correct?
The Shaykh:
Yes, all of this is correct. If he passed the miqat intending to perform Hajj and did not enter ihram, he left an obligatory duty, which is entering ihram from the miqat. He passed by wearing his clothes while intending to enter ihram. If he intended to enter ihram after passing the miqat, he intended it but did not remove the clothes. He did not remove the clothes, so he owes a second fidyah for the clothes, and he also owes a fidyah for covering the head from the time he intends to enter ihram. As long as he has not yet intended to enter ihram, he owes nothing except the first fidyah, which is for passing the miqat without entering ihram. His passing the miqat while intending to perform Hajj and not entering ihram establishes a fidyah for him, unless he returns before entering ihram. If he returns and enters ihram from the miqat, he owes nothing. But if he goes on and does not enter ihram until after passing the miqat or reaching Makkah, then from the time he intends to enter ihram, he must remove the sewn garments and wear the izar and rida. If he does not remove them, he owes two fidyahs: one for the sewn garment on the body and one for covering the head.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you,
Source
75-اللقاء الأسبوعي مع الشيخ صالح الفوزان - 04 — archive.org (54:31)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.