The ruling on the blockage of the exit and the opening of another

Question : If the exit is blocked and another one opens.

Answer : No. No, it has no ruling. The rulings of the usual exit have not been established for it, except if urine or feces come out, in which case there is no harm. This is clear. The rulings of the usual exit have not been established for it, as we mentioned. So if one touches it, the wudu' is not invalidated. If wind comes out of it, the wudu' is not invalidated. If someone has intercourse with him, ghusl is not obligatory. The important point is that if the exit is blocked and another one opens, the rulings of the usual exit are not established for it. So there is no invalidation of wudu' by wind from it or by touching it. But urine and feces, because they are urine and feces, invalidate the wudu' from wherever they come out. Some scholars said that if this exit is from above the stomach, it is like vomit, and if it is from below it, it is like feces. This is the choice of Ibn Aqil from our scholars. Look at the fiqh in this opinion, is it good or not? He says if they open it like doctors do, opening an aperture so that food comes out of the stomach itself, then this is not like urine or feces. And if it is from below, meaning from the intestines, then it is in the ruling of urine and feces. What is your opinion of this?
It is good, in fact, this is good and the fiqh is clear. The evidence is that if a person vomits from the stomach, it does not invalidate the wudu' according to the stronger opinion, or it invalidates it if it is a lot according to the well-known view of the madhhab. As for the madhhab, they say if it opens, it invalidates the wudu' whether it is a little or a lot, a little or a lot.