The ruling on a woman who lost her husband during the sa'y and completed another 'Umrah

The questioner:
A woman circumambulated with her husband during the sa'y and lost him. Then she did not complete her sa'y and traveled. I say, a woman, I think she went with her husband as a pilgrim for 'Umrah.

The Shaykh:
Like Hajj and 'Umrah.

The questioner:
She performed 'Umrah and lost him during the sa'y, and after that she did not complete her sa'y and performed several 'Umrahs after that. What is required of her?

The Shaykh:
It is obligatory for her to go and complete the sa'y for the 'Umrahs that are upon her. This 'Umrah is considered to have completed it.

The questioner:
Yes, she performed 'Umrah for ten days, she performed 'Umrah for ten days. Until.

The Shaykh:
The most likely, and Allah knows best, is that the first 'Umrah she performed after the first 'Umrah completes it; because her sa'y for the new 'Umrah completed the previous 'Umrah, and her shortening of hair or exiting the state of ihram with it, and the prayer of the second 'Umrah completes the first 'Umrah. As for the 'Umrah and the family, it is in its place, there is nothing in it.

Another questioner:
Hajj, may it be better for you, the sa'y in Hajj.

The Shaykh:
She performed 'Umrah after the first 'Umrah. The sa'y in the second 'Umrah completed the first 'Umrah, because she was still responsible for the first 'Umrah. So her sa'y in the second one completes the first, and her shortening of hair exited her from the first. She exited from two 'Umrahs in one 'Umrah. So her sa'y and shortening of hair resulted in exiting the state of ihram. And her last 'Umrah remains as it is. If her husband had intercourse with her, she owes a fidyah, a sacrificial animal, and she must make up the 'Umrah in which he had intercourse with her. And if she performed 'Umrah after that, it becomes a make-up for the 'Umrah from the miqat from which she entered ihram for the first one. It becomes a make-up for the first one. If she performed 'Umrah after the intercourse, and if she did not perform anything, she owes a new 'Umrah, as the Companions issued a fatwa to this effect.

Another questioner:
But does the reason require that she intend to cure this 'Umrah?

The Shaykh:
Hmm?

Another questioner:
We say she performed a new 'Umrah and did not intend that.

The Shaykh:
Because the meaning is one, the meaning is one. Yes.

Another questioner:
And the same applies if he was in the sa'y of Hajj and then performed 'Umrah.

The Shaykh:
Welcome, yes.

Another questioner:
Like if he was in the sa'y of Hajj and then performed 'Umrah after that. If this was in the sa'y of Hajj. Then he performed 'Umrah.

The Shaykh:
This is a matter for consideration, because if he specified the Hajj, he specified the 'Umrah. It may be said that she should perform the next 'Umrah in its place, because she has already exited from the first one, and she should perform it with the intention of Hajj.

Another questioner:
And from the regret of exiting with your 'Umrah.

The questioner:
In the other particles.

Another questioner:
With 'Umrah, does it resemble one who intended Hajj as tamattu' and then after performing 'Umrah, instead of not performing Hajj? What happens?

The Shaykh:
As long as he came for 'Umrah, nothing is lost. As long as it is 'Umrah and 'Umrah, he loses nothing, he exits, he carries it.

Another questioner:
If my intention is from the side of the hady, does this not become from the side of the light?

The Shaykh:
No, nothing is upon him. Upon him is the hadith of the intellect.

Another questioner:
I am one.

The Shaykh:
He owes only the hady of being prevented. He owes the hady of being prevented, one sacrificial animal, or a seventh of a camel or a seventh of a cow, then he slaughters it, then he shortens his hair and performs Hajj.

Another questioner:
If it was missed, for example, Hajj was missed from him, then he exited with 'Umrah. Does he resemble one who intended to perform tamattu'?

The Shaykh:
This is what 'Umar chose for them. He made them perform Hajj from before, and upon them is a Hajj. He likened them to one who entered ihram for 'Umrah, and Hajj all together, or with Hajj and something happened, then he exited with 'Umrah. He likened them to him.

Another questioner:
Well, no problem.

The Shaykh:
He likened them to it.

Another questioner:
Meaning, after he completed the sa'y and instead of not performing Hajj, there is nothing upon him, do not say.

The Shaykh:
He likened his 'Umrah to one who performed Hajj as qiran or ifrad and then exited with 'Umrah. Then he performs Hajj and offers a sacrifice, as the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) issued a fatwa.

Another questioner:
Without being prevented.

The Shaykh:
Yes, yes.

Another questioner:
The statement of Ibn 'Abbas: The substitute is only for one who broke his Hajj by pleasure. As for one who was prevented by an enemy or illness, he exits and does not return.

The Shaykh:
It did not show me a face, and it did not show me a face. Yes.

Another questioner:
The next new 'Umrah needs a sa'y for it.

The Shaykh:
But she entered her new 'Umrah, what is its meaning? She entered the first 'Umrah, what is its doubt, it is completed, because he is still in ihram. Her new 'Umrah has no place, he is still in ihram, so it is a confirmation of the first 'Umrah. Like one who enters ihram for his Hajj while he is in ihram for Hajj. Ihram for the new Hajj, thinking that the first Hajj is invalid and it is invalid. It is not a confirmation of the first ihram, and it does not harm him. He completed it, and praise be to Allah.

The questioner:
If she used other prohibitions, I say, if she shortened her hair and applied perfume?

The Shaykh:
This is with the need for ignorance.

The questioner:
Peace be upon you.

The Shaykh:
Yes.