The ruling on eating from the food of the People of the Book and from wealth mixed with the forbidden
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
Meaning Abu Humza has a spear for them, or he added a larger one for them.
The Shaykh:
Yes. Or the forbidden wealth and gray hair. And. No, no, it is not eaten from the forbidden, it is not eaten from the forbidden. Estimating what makes it lawful, as for this, it has reached goodness and became his wealth, it no longer became charity, it became his wealth.
The questioner:
It ended. What about the Jews, O Shaykh?
The Shaykh:
This slaughter is freed in its state wherever it is.
The questioner:
Fine, and what about the Jews, O Shaykh, may Allah preserve you, did they eat riba (usury or interest)?
The Shaykh:
You do not know, you do not know if they presented to you something from riba, no, but if you do not know, there is no harm.
The questioner:
Their eating.
The Shaykh:
You see from them the Prophet saw for them a shield of iron.
The questioner:
And eating the poisoned tea.
The Shaykh:
But only if you do not know, if you know the forbidden, no.
The questioner:
This is their origin, O Shaykh, may he preserve him.
The Shaykh:
No, and even if, the origin is not accepted.
The questioner:
Riba, and it has been prohibited.
The Shaykh:
With this it does not benefit, it is necessary, but this indicates that the mixed and intermingled water has no harm, as for the known.
The questioner:
The eye is the one about which one is veiled.
The Shaykh:
Resembling is no harm, but if you know that this is the forbidden, do not eat from it.
The questioner:
Yes, may Allah bless you. Yes.
The Shaykh:
Hmm?
The questioner:
Or scrupulousness regarding the doubtful.
The Shaykh:
If it is facilitated, if it is facilitated, you are scrupulous, fine, but if it entails the stone of your brother or enmity, no, but if it is facilitated without a specific stone, the Sunnah, no harm.
The questioner:
It is not said.
The Shaykh:
If you know that this is stolen, dazed, riba, where is the riba? No. Yes. If his wealth is all from the bank, his income is forbidden, he deserves boycott, but if he has another income, it may be from the other income, like the food of the Jews and Christians and similar, it may be from the other income.
The questioner:
Rather, how did you deal with him?
The Shaykh:
What enters him, if your income is only from riba, its prohibition is known, but if riba comes to him and he has other works, buying and selling with other causes, a buyer. Yes. Yes. Yes. If he sent the food and its prayer is upon you, you must disapprove of him and teach him and direct him to good and advise him, the best of people. Food, on the origin of the oath. Yes.
Meaning Abu Humza has a spear for them, or he added a larger one for them.
The Shaykh:
Yes. Or the forbidden wealth and gray hair. And. No, no, it is not eaten from the forbidden, it is not eaten from the forbidden. Estimating what makes it lawful, as for this, it has reached goodness and became his wealth, it no longer became charity, it became his wealth.
The questioner:
It ended. What about the Jews, O Shaykh?
The Shaykh:
This slaughter is freed in its state wherever it is.
The questioner:
Fine, and what about the Jews, O Shaykh, may Allah preserve you, did they eat riba (usury or interest)?
The Shaykh:
You do not know, you do not know if they presented to you something from riba, no, but if you do not know, there is no harm.
The questioner:
Their eating.
The Shaykh:
You see from them the Prophet saw for them a shield of iron.
The questioner:
And eating the poisoned tea.
The Shaykh:
But only if you do not know, if you know the forbidden, no.
The questioner:
This is their origin, O Shaykh, may he preserve him.
The Shaykh:
No, and even if, the origin is not accepted.
The questioner:
Riba, and it has been prohibited.
The Shaykh:
With this it does not benefit, it is necessary, but this indicates that the mixed and intermingled water has no harm, as for the known.
The questioner:
The eye is the one about which one is veiled.
The Shaykh:
Resembling is no harm, but if you know that this is the forbidden, do not eat from it.
The questioner:
Yes, may Allah bless you. Yes.
The Shaykh:
Hmm?
The questioner:
Or scrupulousness regarding the doubtful.
The Shaykh:
If it is facilitated, if it is facilitated, you are scrupulous, fine, but if it entails the stone of your brother or enmity, no, but if it is facilitated without a specific stone, the Sunnah, no harm.
The questioner:
It is not said.
The Shaykh:
If you know that this is stolen, dazed, riba, where is the riba? No. Yes. If his wealth is all from the bank, his income is forbidden, he deserves boycott, but if he has another income, it may be from the other income, like the food of the Jews and Christians and similar, it may be from the other income.
The questioner:
Rather, how did you deal with him?
The Shaykh:
What enters him, if your income is only from riba, its prohibition is known, but if riba comes to him and he has other works, buying and selling with other causes, a buyer. Yes. Yes. Yes. If he sent the food and its prayer is upon you, you must disapprove of him and teach him and direct him to good and advise him, the best of people. Food, on the origin of the oath. Yes.
Source
التعليق على كتاب زاد المعاد، بداية من فصل فى هديه - صلى الله عليه وسلم - فى الصدقة والزكاة — islamhouse.com (47:39)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.