The ruling on one who enters the state of ihram for 'Umrah and then intends to perform Hajj from Makkah
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
The questioner says: What is the ruling on one who enters the state of ihram for 'Umrah in the months of Hajj, then returns to Riyadh, and then passes by the miqat while intending to enter the state of ihram?
The Shaykh:
Yes.
The questioner:
One who enters the state of ihram for 'Umrah in the months of Hajj, then returns to Riyadh twice, or so, and then passes by the miqat intending to perform Hajj without entering the state of ihram, and initiates Hajj from Makkah, knowing that he has already performed 'Umrah with the intention of tamattu', what is the ruling on that? Please inform us, may Allah reward you with good.
The Shaykh:
The apparent meaning of the texts is that it is forbidden to enter the state of ihram for Hajj from the miqat, or otherwise, to perform a new second 'Umrah; because the texts generalize for those who are not from Makkah and for those who are not from their hometowns, such as one who goes to Makkah or to Riyadh or somewhere other than Riyadh and then returns for the sake of Hajj. The texts generalize this. So what he should do is enter the state of ihram for Hajj and remain in his state of ihram, or perform a second 'Umrah, other than his previous 'Umrah, so that he does not pass the miqats and perform Hajj without being in the state of ihram. This is the position. If he does this, he will be a mutamatti'. If he does this, he will be a mutamatti'. Then he completes the tamattu' with the new 'Umrah, not the old one, I mean. If he went to his family and returned, it is narrated from 'Umar and the group that he would be considered to have exited the state of ihram if it was only for his family specifically. But if he went to the direction of the return, he remains in his state of tamattu', like the one who goes to Jeddah or al-Ta'if and returns; he remains in his state of tamattu'.
The questioner says: What is the ruling on one who enters the state of ihram for 'Umrah in the months of Hajj, then returns to Riyadh, and then passes by the miqat while intending to enter the state of ihram?
The Shaykh:
Yes.
The questioner:
One who enters the state of ihram for 'Umrah in the months of Hajj, then returns to Riyadh twice, or so, and then passes by the miqat intending to perform Hajj without entering the state of ihram, and initiates Hajj from Makkah, knowing that he has already performed 'Umrah with the intention of tamattu', what is the ruling on that? Please inform us, may Allah reward you with good.
The Shaykh:
The apparent meaning of the texts is that it is forbidden to enter the state of ihram for Hajj from the miqat, or otherwise, to perform a new second 'Umrah; because the texts generalize for those who are not from Makkah and for those who are not from their hometowns, such as one who goes to Makkah or to Riyadh or somewhere other than Riyadh and then returns for the sake of Hajj. The texts generalize this. So what he should do is enter the state of ihram for Hajj and remain in his state of ihram, or perform a second 'Umrah, other than his previous 'Umrah, so that he does not pass the miqats and perform Hajj without being in the state of ihram. This is the position. If he does this, he will be a mutamatti'. If he does this, he will be a mutamatti'. Then he completes the tamattu' with the new 'Umrah, not the old one, I mean. If he went to his family and returned, it is narrated from 'Umar and the group that he would be considered to have exited the state of ihram if it was only for his family specifically. But if he went to the direction of the return, he remains in his state of tamattu', like the one who goes to Jeddah or al-Ta'if and returns; he remains in his state of tamattu'.
Source
شرح بلوغ المرام [ ابن باز ] [ الشرح الجديد ]، باب صفة الحج ودخول مكة — islamhouse.com (3:55)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.