Discussions on some of the causes that necessitate the full ritual bath
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : If one gathers the carrion, or for example, if one approaches the carrion, is this considered the female organ? Is it considered the circumcision site? And the man touching the male organ? And the hadith of 'Aishah: "When the two circumcision sites touch and no discharge occurs," this and other such matters.
The Shaykh : This is a rare issue, meaning it can be said that this is rare, meaning that even when the Messenger spoke of this matter, this issue may not have occurred to his mind.
The questioner : But the statement of the one who exerts effort, does this contradict the hadith? Is it a complete copy of the marginal note?
The Shaykh : Absolutely not, the general is to be restricted by the specific.
The questioner : Okay, and regarding the whole thing, it is also considered. But the problem is that it is considered the circumcision site for them if it is not. It is not considered a circumcision site. Okay, if the man's circumcision site touches.
The Shaykh : They say that this organ, as long as we are not certain that it is female, is in the position of any opening in the body. No pleasure is obtained from it unless discharge occurs.
The questioner : Meaning it is not considered a circumcision site.
The Shaykh : When it is considered a circumcision site, because it is not original, like any opening in the body, if a person did not have an opening in his body, for example, then the ruling of the original organ does not apply to it.
The questioner : The hadith from which it is taken that it is merely a lowering.
The Shaykh : Yes, if the two circumcision sites touch, there should be no problem for them, because the man's circumcision site is located above the glans, the circumcision is the cutting of the skin surrounding the entire glans, and the woman's circumcision site is known, and there is no meeting except by alteration.
The questioner : What do you say in the case where a living person follows a dead one, or a living one if the other is dead?
The Shaykh : Or it is more likely that nothing is required of him unless discharge occurs.
The Shaykh : This is a rare issue, meaning it can be said that this is rare, meaning that even when the Messenger spoke of this matter, this issue may not have occurred to his mind.
The questioner : But the statement of the one who exerts effort, does this contradict the hadith? Is it a complete copy of the marginal note?
The Shaykh : Absolutely not, the general is to be restricted by the specific.
The questioner : Okay, and regarding the whole thing, it is also considered. But the problem is that it is considered the circumcision site for them if it is not. It is not considered a circumcision site. Okay, if the man's circumcision site touches.
The Shaykh : They say that this organ, as long as we are not certain that it is female, is in the position of any opening in the body. No pleasure is obtained from it unless discharge occurs.
The questioner : Meaning it is not considered a circumcision site.
The Shaykh : When it is considered a circumcision site, because it is not original, like any opening in the body, if a person did not have an opening in his body, for example, then the ruling of the original organ does not apply to it.
The questioner : The hadith from which it is taken that it is merely a lowering.
The Shaykh : Yes, if the two circumcision sites touch, there should be no problem for them, because the man's circumcision site is located above the glans, the circumcision is the cutting of the skin surrounding the entire glans, and the woman's circumcision site is known, and there is no meeting except by alteration.
The questioner : What do you say in the case where a living person follows a dead one, or a living one if the other is dead?
The Shaykh : Or it is more likely that nothing is required of him unless discharge occurs.
Source
قناة «فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن صالح العثيمين»، 546مناقشات في بعض موجبات الغسل 1📔 الشرح الممتع على زاد المستقنع - ابن عثيمين - مشروع كبار العلماء — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.