Does a partial leather sock have the same ruling as a full leather sock regarding wiping?

The questioner : Shaykh, if someone were to say that some absolute texts are modified by language. I.

The Shaykh : Language. For example, a torn leather sock is called a khuff, but it is not called a full khuff. The khuff is for some parts, the makh is for some parts, but some parts are not covered. However, who says that in language, the term khuff is not applied except to what covers the foot?

The questioner : This is what I mean, my brother, one of the brothers.

The Shaykh : No, it is not the obligatory knowledge. For this reason, many scholars who say that it is not permissible to wipe over a torn sock hold that if one wears something that describes the skin, such as glass or a bandage in the present time, he wipes over it. It is not the knowledge of covering.

The questioner : I mean, the fear in the partial case is that it is a ruling in the back.

The Shaykh : I say, yes, as long as the foot benefits from it and one can walk in it.