The ruling on specifying the sacrificial animal if a man is an agent for more than one person

The questioner : May Allah bless you. He was entrusted with this. This is fifty, fifty men, a need. Is it obligatory for him to intend when mentioning each target?

The Shaykh : Specifying, I mean, my intention.

The questioner : Yes.

The Shaykh : Specifying. I see that it is necessary to do so.

The questioner : And I believe, father.

The Shaykh : Even if it is a thousand.

The questioner : Is there no problem, Shaykh?

The Shaykh : There is no hardship if there is no hardship, he is not entrusted. I mean, for example, I slaughter this for whom? For one of them.

The questioner : Two days and in general.

The Shaykh : In general means that they shared in one thing, a feeling.

The questioner : I know that this hundred is for these hundred.

The Shaykh : Originally, every single soul, every sheep has one soul.

The questioner : But it is not possible.

The Shaykh : And this is food for him, there is no harm.

The questioner : Yes, they give them the black ones, now they give them the black ones.

The Shaykh : Yes, indeed, this is from the trial, this is from the trial. If this happens, who is it slaughtered for? For one of this group, for one of the group, specify who it is? No, there must be a naming, one person present with the list says so-and-so and so-and-so, in the name of Allah, bring the sheep for him, and so on. I am not telling you about the reality, I say you must specify who it is for, because if you intend for one, from whom? One of them, Zayd or 'Abd, this is a problem. Yes, this is also from the trial.