The ruling on intercourse in the front or back passage with a human or an animal before the first exit from the state of ihram

The Shaykh : Yes.

The questioner : There is no difference between intercourse in the front or back passage with a human or an animal, because it is intercourse in the private parts, resembling intercourse with a human woman.

The Shaykh : As for his statement that there is no difference in intercourse between the front and back passage, this is sound. This is sound, because a person may take more pleasure in the back passage than the front passage if Allah has inverted his fitrah (innate natural disposition); then it is brought to us.
Men demand that their wives have intercourse with them in the back passage by force, and they do not have intercourse in the front passage. But these are people whose hearts Allah has inverted, may Allah protect us from that. The important point is that he takes pleasure in it. As for the animal, a person hesitates about this. There is no doubt that it is forbidden, but does the pleasure obtained from intercourse with an animal occur as it occurs in intercourse with a human? I do not think so. Even one who is afflicted with it does not see that he takes pleasure in it as he takes pleasure in intercourse with a human. So there is a consideration here. If the matter is a matter of scholarly consensus (ijma'), we do not depart from the consensus. If there is scholarly disagreement (khilaf) in it, the correct view is the one that says that it does not invalidate the act of worship. But if ejaculation occurs, he owes the fidyah (ransom payment) of the performance, as is known in the case of ejaculation. Yes.