Some students of knowledge mention a hadith that contains a discrepancy, and they say: “This is a corroborating narration for this one,” even though this hadith revolves around a single narrator and a single source.

The questioner : We find that some of the famous students of knowledge mention a hadith that contains a discrepancy, and they say: “This is a corroborating narration for this one,” even though this hadith revolves around a single narrator and a single source, and there is an addition or omission in the chain or the text. So when you see him gather the routes, he says: “This corroborates that one.” What is your opinion, O our Shaykh, on this?

The Shaykh : If your question is clear and I understood it well, then this is flimsy talk with no value, but =
-- Now pay attention to your right, bit by bit, take it easy, on the bridge --
= But I say: Do you have an example in mind? Because I am surprised, though in reality I am not surprised regarding those who are currently active in this science; we find strange things from them, but the principle is to assume the best, so do you?

The questioner : No, by Allah, I do not have one in mind right now.
Usually, O our Shaykh, if you find that he gathers all the routes, and all the narrations are found to converge on a single narrator.

The Shaykh : If it is as you say, then you have already received the answer.

The questioner: All right.