What is a hasan hadith in its own right?

The Shaykh:
I mean, you don't know what a hasan hadith is. What is a hasan hadith in its own right?

The questioner:
I found expressions in what appeared to me to be general, and I found expressions indicating that this rule is relied upon by
some, but not by all. For example, they said this is al-Tirmidhi's condition in al-Tahsil, and such and such is raised against it.
I found that the matter is long, as ...

The Shaykh:
I say, my brother, briefly: if this meaning is clear in your mind, you will understand it; and if it is not clear, then discuss
it. A hasan hadith in its own right must have all the conditions of a sahih hadith in its own right ...
This handshake did not please me, heh.
Except that one of its narrators is weak in his precision in memorization, that is all.

The questioner:
This is in its own right.

The Shaykh:
Yes, this is correct. A hasan in its own right. Do you understand this statement?

The questioner:
One of its narrators, or more, I mean.

The Shaykh:
This is if it is one ... Do you understand this matter?

The questioner :
Understood.

The Shaykh :
Good, did you find it in what you read?

The questioner :
Yes, it is there.

The Shaykh :
Good, what is the difficulty for you in it?

The questioner :
That it is called a hasan hadith in its own right while he adopts this rule, but during the explanation of this, I mean, regarding the ruling
on the hadith, I mean, what is close in the science of terminology regarding this rule does not apply to what he called it
in this case, and he calls it hasan in its own right.

The Shaykh :
You say it does not apply.

The questioner:
I see that it does not apply.

The Shaykh :
For example, why does it not apply?

The questioner :
I sometimes find in al-Maqasid al-Hasanah hadiths where the author goes to grade them as hasan, and there is among their narrators, I mean, someone
who is, I mean, whose weakness has been clarified by the scholars, so I am surprised how he rushes to grade it as hasan when this man speaks about him.

The Shaykh :
Good, is this narrator you describe as having clarified weakness so in the view of everyone who has written a biography of him, as you think?

The questioner :
Certainly not, I do not think so.

The Shaykh:
You do not think so, so it means it is clarified as weak in your view. You returned the matter to what I hinted at in the beginning of the speech, the difficulty
that I know in the form that preceded is only strong if that man you describe as having clarified weakness is weak by consensus, in which case the difficulty and the answer are valid from the angle that we often
clarify that they use the term "tahkim" and mean "tahsin" for another hadith.
This is not from ... sometimes

The questioner:
Yes, I tell you this is a hasan chain, and it is, I mean, considering its corroborating narrations and supporting chains.

The Shaykh:
If precision requires you to say that it is a hasan hadith.

The questioner:
Therefore we said sometimes.

The Shaykh:
That is why we sometimes said