Is wiping over the slippers conditional on them covering the ankles?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner :
Regarding wiping over the slippers, it is required that they cover the ankles.
The Shaykh:
It is not required, because the slippers do not cover the ankles. The word "slipper" linguistically...
The questioner:
So, if we... this exposed part, can we wipe over it?
The Shaykh:
If you did not wipe over them while in a state of purity, but they were put on while in a state of purity, and then he quickly takes them off...
It is very rare. So if we consider this rare case, meaning he put them on while in a state of purity and wipes over them...
The questioner:
If you wipe over the socks and then take the socks off, the purity is gone.
The Shaykh:
The ablution is valid, but it is not permissible to wipe over them again. In the next ablution, it is necessary to wash the feet.
As for the previous ablution, it is valid until it is broken by one of the things that break ablution, meaning taking off the item wiped over.
Taking it off does not break the ablution, just as if he wiped over the hair of his head and then cut it. He performed ablution and then cut his nails.
The questioner:
If he takes them off and then puts them back on, it is permissible to wipe over them again.
The Shaykh:
We told you it is not permissible.
The questioner:
No, he took them off while in a state of purity and put them back on while in a state of purity.
The Shaykh:
Ah, no, that is another issue. That is, as long as nothing happened, as long as he did not wipe over them, he put them on the first time while in...
a state of purity. He took them off while in a state of purity and put them back on while in a state of purity. As long as he did not wipe over them, it is as if he put them on...
the first time
The questioner :
There is a disagreement in the issue.
The Shaykh :
No, this is a point of disagreement.
The questioner :
There is a disagreement in the Shafi'i school of jurisprudence.
The Shaykh :
Is it the first issue or the second one?
The questioner :
The one who washed, if he wiped over them.
The Shaykh :
This is the first one. Many say there is a disagreement in the issue. Some say if he takes off the item wiped over, his ablution becomes invalid.
So it must be renewed. Some say it becomes invalid temporarily until he washes his feet. And some say he owes nothing.
His ablution is valid, and this is the correct opinion. Please, go ahead.
Regarding wiping over the slippers, it is required that they cover the ankles.
The Shaykh:
It is not required, because the slippers do not cover the ankles. The word "slipper" linguistically...
The questioner:
So, if we... this exposed part, can we wipe over it?
The Shaykh:
If you did not wipe over them while in a state of purity, but they were put on while in a state of purity, and then he quickly takes them off...
It is very rare. So if we consider this rare case, meaning he put them on while in a state of purity and wipes over them...
The questioner:
If you wipe over the socks and then take the socks off, the purity is gone.
The Shaykh:
The ablution is valid, but it is not permissible to wipe over them again. In the next ablution, it is necessary to wash the feet.
As for the previous ablution, it is valid until it is broken by one of the things that break ablution, meaning taking off the item wiped over.
Taking it off does not break the ablution, just as if he wiped over the hair of his head and then cut it. He performed ablution and then cut his nails.
The questioner:
If he takes them off and then puts them back on, it is permissible to wipe over them again.
The Shaykh:
We told you it is not permissible.
The questioner:
No, he took them off while in a state of purity and put them back on while in a state of purity.
The Shaykh:
Ah, no, that is another issue. That is, as long as nothing happened, as long as he did not wipe over them, he put them on the first time while in...
a state of purity. He took them off while in a state of purity and put them back on while in a state of purity. As long as he did not wipe over them, it is as if he put them on...
the first time
The questioner :
There is a disagreement in the issue.
The Shaykh :
No, this is a point of disagreement.
The questioner :
There is a disagreement in the Shafi'i school of jurisprudence.
The Shaykh :
Is it the first issue or the second one?
The questioner :
The one who washed, if he wiped over them.
The Shaykh :
This is the first one. Many say there is a disagreement in the issue. Some say if he takes off the item wiped over, his ablution becomes invalid.
So it must be renewed. Some say it becomes invalid temporarily until he washes his feet. And some say he owes nothing.
His ablution is valid, and this is the correct opinion. Please, go ahead.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.
