Is it permissible to kill frogs and eat them?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Shaykh, regarding the frog, you know that there is a prohibition against killing it; is it eaten?
The Shaykh: No.
The questioner : Okay; is there evidence that it is not permissible to eat it?
The Shaykh : Killing.
The questioner : Regarding killing...
The Shaykh : It is prohibited to kill...
The questioner : Okay; Shaykh, regarding locusts.
The Shaykh : ...regarding?
The questioner : Regarding locusts.
The Shaykh : Locusts.
The questioner : Meaning, it is prohibited to kill them! And?
The Shaykh: Yes.
Another questioner : The text:.
The Shaykh : Was its permissibility derived from the prohibition of killing it, from the text prohibiting its killing, or from something else?
The questioner : It was found dead.
The Shaykh : Yes.
Another questioner : From another text.
The questioner : Meaning:, or it was found dead.
The Shaykh : Why are you answering the question with C and J?
The questioner : C, we need C.
The Shaykh : I am saying: Was its eating made permissible by the prohibition of killing it, or by something else?
The questioner : From something else... they deceived me.
The Shaykh : This is the answer, this is the answer; in that caseThe questioner : The first question: If he sees a need, he asks: What is this other thing? He asks, and he did ask, what is the other thing?
The questioner : The text:.
The Shaykh : Okay; is there then a difference between the prohibition of killing it and the permissibility of eating it?
The questioner : There is not!
The Shaykh : Okay; is it valid to extend this ruling to that which is prohibited to be killed, but for which no text has come regarding its eating?
The questioner : It is not authentic.
The Shaykh : That is it.
The Shaykh: No.
The questioner : Okay; is there evidence that it is not permissible to eat it?
The Shaykh : Killing.
The questioner : Regarding killing...
The Shaykh : It is prohibited to kill...
The questioner : Okay; Shaykh, regarding locusts.
The Shaykh : ...regarding?
The questioner : Regarding locusts.
The Shaykh : Locusts.
The questioner : Meaning, it is prohibited to kill them! And
It was made permissible
أُحِلَّتThe Shaykh: Yes.
Another questioner : The text:
Two dead things were made permissible for us
أُحِلَّت لنا مَيْتتانThe Shaykh : Was its permissibility derived from the prohibition of killing it, from the text prohibiting its killing, or from something else?
The questioner : It was found dead.
The Shaykh : Yes.
Another questioner : From another text.
The questioner : Meaning:
Two dead things were made permissible
أُحِلَّ مَيْتتانThe Shaykh : Why are you answering the question with C and J?
The questioner : C, we need C.
The Shaykh : I am saying: Was its eating made permissible by the prohibition of killing it, or by something else?
The questioner : From something else... they deceived me.
The Shaykh : This is the answer, this is the answer; in that caseThe questioner : The first question: If he sees a need, he asks: What is this other thing? He asks, and he did ask, what is the other thing?
The questioner : The text:
Two dead things were made permissible for us
أُحِلَّت لنا مَيْتتانThe Shaykh : Okay; is there then a difference between the prohibition of killing it and the permissibility of eating it?
The questioner : There is not!
The Shaykh : Okay; is it valid to extend this ruling to that which is prohibited to be killed, but for which no text has come regarding its eating?
The questioner : It is not authentic.
The Shaykh : That is it.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.