Is a witness whose identity is unknown cited as evidence?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : The second question is about a witness whose identity is unknown: is he cited as evidence?
The Shaykh: No.
The questioner : Okay.
The Shaykh : As a general rule, he is not cited as evidence.
The questioner : As a general rule, but in terms of practical application.
The Shaykh : However, in practice, he may be cited as part of the other witnesses.
The questioner : But if he is unknown in identity, and unknown in identity, he is not cited as evidence.
The Shaykh : He is not cited as evidence.
The questioner : What about a witness unknown in identity and another chain of narration that has a break?
The Shaykh : The same applies.
The questioner : Okay.
The Shaykh: No.
The questioner : Okay.
The Shaykh : As a general rule, he is not cited as evidence.
The questioner : As a general rule, but in terms of practical application.
The Shaykh : However, in practice, he may be cited as part of the other witnesses.
The questioner : But if he is unknown in identity, and unknown in identity, he is not cited as evidence.
The Shaykh : He is not cited as evidence.
The questioner : What about a witness unknown in identity and another chain of narration that has a break?
The Shaykh : The same applies.
The questioner : Okay.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.
