Abu Malik’s comment on the Shi'ah’s hostility toward the people of the Sunnah and the community.

Abu Malik: Commenting on the words of the brother Jamal

The Shaykh : Please go ahead.
Abu Malik: I say that we do not want this awareness campaign to be in Afghanistan or in Pakistan, because there, the killing of a person like Ihsan (may Allah have mercy on him) is sufficient to confirm the depth of the existing problem, or rather the deep-seated black hatred in the hearts of the Shi'ah toward the people of the Sunnah and the community. The matter does not require propaganda or warning or sounding the alarm there. What is needed, in my opinion—and I think this is also a mistake—is that what you are doing now there, I believe, is neither wise nor political. Rather, there must be secrecy and concealment in resisting these people, because they are more capable of igniting the fire of fitnah (trial, discord or temptation) and stoking it for war and taking revenge for themselves. They do not take revenge for money or land or the like, but rather for a creed. This creed has been driving them relentlessly until they established a state and founded a system in Iran, the system of the mullahs. From the very first day this system was established, they have been saying, “We want to export the revolution outside of Iran.” I do not think that what is happening now is anything but one of the fruits that this revolution has borne within Iran, as you mentioned in your speech just now. Therefore, I want this warning to come from someone like Hakim Yar or like Sayyaf, or from the brother leaders who are there, the ones who are at odds with one another among the people of the Sunnah and the community. They should come to the Arab countries and explain to the ignorant Muslims here that the creed of the Shi'ah is the greatest danger now. And that the great cooperation or great joy that overtook them, as if each of them had found a lost treasure, when Iraq announced the reconciliation between it and Iran—they rejoiced greatly and said that Islam would triumph and that Iran would become the greatest and sole supporter of Iraq. We want to show these people that this reconciliation between Iran and Iraq is the beginning of the great danger that threatens our region, the region of the Levant. And this danger lies in the fact that it is impossible for Iran to support Iraq or stand in support of Iraq, whether near or far. Iran is now waiting for the opportunity in which the fire of war may break out, so that it can defeat Iraq, enter southern Iraq, and seize the holy shrines. We want two things: first, that these leaders of the organizations who are there with a sound creed, not the wobbly creed that we know, should unite themselves on the basis of the creed and send someone to represent the pure Islamic creed, not the Islamic creed of mere appeasement. I say, “There is no god but Allah,” and the other says, “There is no god but Allah,” and that is the end of it. Second, that they come to these ignorant people who are here in our lands, in the Levant, in Egypt, and elsewhere, and warn them of the danger that threatens them if they remain in their state of heedlessness and lack of political, religious, and creedal awareness, and their absolute submission to anyone who comes and claims to support the cause of Palestine. This is what is required now, and nothing else. We do not want anything else, because there are those who understand the truth, even within Afghanistan. I do not think that the people of the Sunnah and the community in Afghanistan, even if they are among the ignorant ones you mentioned—ninety percent of them are ignorant—but at least ninety percent know what the Shi'ah are, due to their long coexistence with the Shi'ah over this period of time. So what concerns us is that we want them to come here, especially at this particular time when the reconciliation between Iraq and Iran has taken place, and Iraq has given Iran everything it had wished to take from Iraq.