Another example of the word "dar" regarding its three types of indication
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Now, if we say: this is a house, this is a "dar," this is a "dar." The word "dar" indicates the house and what is in it by way of exact correspondence, meaning it includes what they call the courtyard, the rooms, the cells, the hall, and the sitting room; it covers all of them by exact correspondence.
And it indicates the sitting room alone by way of inclusion. Is that right? Good.
And it indicates its builder by way of implication, because this house must have a clear builder.
As for the indication by exact correspondence and the indication by inclusion, no one is incapable of them; every person understands them. Every person understands that if you say: Allah is the All-Hearing, that "the All-Hearing" indicates a Self possessing the attribute of hearing.
But the indication by implication is where scholars differ greatly, because it is based on correct understanding. People differ and vary in their understandings; a person may know several matters from this evidence that are implied by the evidence, while another dull person does not understand these implications.
So people differ greatly regarding implications. For this reason, we may find a person who derives many multiple matters from a single evidence, while another is unable to derive more than one or two matters. All of this is due to understanding and the implication that necessitates from the text and what branches off from it.
And it indicates the sitting room alone by way of inclusion. Is that right? Good.
And it indicates its builder by way of implication, because this house must have a clear builder.
As for the indication by exact correspondence and the indication by inclusion, no one is incapable of them; every person understands them. Every person understands that if you say: Allah is the All-Hearing, that "the All-Hearing" indicates a Self possessing the attribute of hearing.
But the indication by implication is where scholars differ greatly, because it is based on correct understanding. People differ and vary in their understandings; a person may know several matters from this evidence that are implied by the evidence, while another dull person does not understand these implications.
So people differ greatly regarding implications. For this reason, we may find a person who derives many multiple matters from a single evidence, while another is unable to derive more than one or two matters. All of this is due to understanding and the implication that necessitates from the text and what branches off from it.