Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

(Discussion on the indication of names and that they are three: correspondence, inclusion, and implication, and an explanation of their meanings) The indication of names is of three types, all of which are known through explanation

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : The author (may Allah have mercy on him) says in this chapter that the indication of names is of three types, all of which are known through explanation
"It indicated by correspondence, likewise by inclusion, *** and likewise by implication, with clear proof"
How many are these? Three: correspondence, inclusion, and implication. - Allahu Akbar - The next lesson, if Allah wills. The next lesson. Yes...
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
The author (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "Chapter:
And the indications, and the indication of names is of three types, all of which are known through explanation"

His saying: "The indication of names": He means the names of Allah, but this ruling is established in all indications of words and terms. Their types are three.
"It indicated by correspondence, likewise by inclusion, *** and likewise by implication, with clear proof" This means that the indications are three: the indication of correspondence, the indication of inclusion, and the indication of implication. These are three.
So the indication of correspondence is: the indication of the name to all of its meaning.
And inclusion is: the indication of the name to part of its meaning.
And implication is: its indication to an external matter that its derivation does not indicate, but it is a necessary external matter, necessary, but the derivation does not indicate it. Did you understand now? What is the indication of inclusion? Correspondence?
The indication of the term to all of its meaning.
Inclusion is to a part of its meaning.
Implication is to an external necessary matter that the term does not indicate from the perspective of derivation, but it is necessary for the meaning. The term, from the perspective of derivation, does not indicate it, and we will postpone the example mentioned by the author.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas