Second: That the Book of Allah the Exalted, which He revealed as an explanation of everything, a guidance for people, a healing for what is in the chests, a clear light, and a criterion between truth and falsehood

The Shaykh :"Second among the false implications is that the Book of Allah—meaning, it follows from their speech that the Book of Allah the Exalted, which He revealed as an explanation of everything, a guidance for people, a healing for what is in the chests, a clear light, and a criterion between truth and falsehood, did not clarify in it what the servants must believe regarding His names and attributes, but rather He left that to their minds, so that they affirm for Allah what they wish and deny what they do not want. And this is clearly invalid" Meaning, according to the speech of these people, it follows that this Quran, which is described with these descriptions, did not clarify what the servants must believe regarding the names and attributes of Allah. Did you understand? And is this a necessary implication or not? It is a necessary implication, because according to their claim, it clarified what is not befitting for Allah, so they chose to interpret it figuratively.