Chapter: Al-Walaa' belongs to the one who freed, and the inheritance of the foundling. And 'Umar said: The foundling is free
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: "Chapter: Al-Walaa' belongs to the one who freed".
The Shaykh : I have it with tanween.
The reader: "Chapter: Al-Walaa' belongs to the one who freed, and the inheritance of the foundling". And 'Umar said: "The foundling is free".
The Shaykh : As for al-walaa', we have previously mentioned in the chapter on inheritance shares that it is a type of kinship that is established for the freed slave and his kin who are related to him through themselves.
And as for the foundling, it is a fa'il form meaning maf'ool, so it is the child who is found with no known father, mother, or lineage; this is called a foundling.
And 'Umar said: "The foundling is free", even if it is possible that he is from a slave woman, but he is free by default.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : We mentioned that these are what we rule by in a general sense, rather, we look at each case individually.
The questioner : Now, if this fornicator admits now, is he subject to the hadd? He said that this is his son?
The Shaykh : He is not subject to the hadd; the hadd must have conditions.
The questioner : And 'Umar said, is it conditional?
The Shaykh : Yes, it is conditional, there is no doubt, it is conditional and definitive, yes.
The Shaykh : I have it with tanween.
The reader: "Chapter: Al-Walaa' belongs to the one who freed, and the inheritance of the foundling". And 'Umar said: "The foundling is free".
The Shaykh : As for al-walaa', we have previously mentioned in the chapter on inheritance shares that it is a type of kinship that is established for the freed slave and his kin who are related to him through themselves.
And as for the foundling, it is a fa'il form meaning maf'ool, so it is the child who is found with no known father, mother, or lineage; this is called a foundling.
And 'Umar said: "The foundling is free", even if it is possible that he is from a slave woman, but he is free by default.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : We mentioned that these are what we rule by in a general sense, rather, we look at each case individually.
The questioner : Now, if this fornicator admits now, is he subject to the hadd? He said that this is his son?
The Shaykh : He is not subject to the hadd; the hadd must have conditions.
The questioner : And 'Umar said, is it conditional?
The Shaykh : Yes, it is conditional, there is no doubt, it is conditional and definitive, yes.