Is it permissible to mention scholarly disagreement to a layperson when he asks?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : No, no. It is not permissible to mention scholarly disagreement to a layperson at all. Mentioning scholarly disagreement to a layperson is a mistake. For a layperson, you state what you see as the truth between you and Allah, whether it agrees with the view of the one you are dealing with or contradicts it. For example, you come and say, "The issue has four narrations from Imam Ahmad, and there are four positions in the madhhab." That is eight. And there are four possibilities besides the positions! That is twelve. And the madhahabs... hehehe. Yes, Khalid?
The questioner : Shaykh, may Allah reward you with good. The answer regarding the evidence of the majority.
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : The answer regarding the evidence of the majority... that this is wealth, and Allah... the obligatory zakah...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : ...what we answered.
The Shaykh : We answered that this is not correct. This restriction is not correct. I say this restriction is not correct. We say that what is obligatory in wealth is what Allah has made obligatory in it.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes, because Allah said:.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : It is not his freeing him, nor his contract of manumission.
The questioner : He said because... and it is not obligatory for him to dispose of his wealth.
The Shaykh : How? ... free, but if Allah has made it obligatory upon him?
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : If Allah has made it obligatory upon him?
The questioner : If Allah has made it obligatory upon him...
The Shaykh : Now, we say Allah has made it obligatory upon him.
The questioner : ...
The questioner : Shaykh, may Allah reward you with good. The answer regarding the evidence of the majority.
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : The answer regarding the evidence of the majority... that this is wealth, and Allah... the obligatory zakah...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : ...what we answered.
The Shaykh : We answered that this is not correct. This restriction is not correct. I say this restriction is not correct. We say that what is obligatory in wealth is what Allah has made obligatory in it.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes, because Allah said:
those who write contracts with them
كاتبوهمThe questioner : ...
The Shaykh : It is not his freeing him, nor his contract of manumission.
The questioner : He said because... and it is not obligatory for him to dispose of his wealth.
The Shaykh : How? ... free, but if Allah has made it obligatory upon him?
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : If Allah has made it obligatory upon him?
The questioner : If Allah has made it obligatory upon him...
The Shaykh : Now, we say Allah has made it obligatory upon him.
The questioner : ...