We said it is permissible to say "munhasiran" and it is permissible to say "munhasiran." What is the meaning of the verse according to the two opinions?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner :"Or intended its use as munhasiran", and we said it is permissible to say munhasiran!
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Can we say munhasiran if the haa in "maqsud" refers to the subject (mubtada'), and munhasiran if it is the predicate (khabar)?
The Shaykh : That does not make sense, because the pronoun refers back to the predicate.
The questioner : Shaykh, if I said...
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : Do we say: the subject is munhasir and the predicate is munhasir?
The Shaykh : No, munhasir: a place of restriction, meaning intended as a place for restriction.
The questioner : Shaykh, Shaykh!
The Shaykh : Yes?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Can we say munhasiran if the haa in "maqsud" refers to the subject (mubtada'), and munhasiran if it is the predicate (khabar)?
The Shaykh : That does not make sense, because the pronoun refers back to the predicate.
The questioner : Shaykh, if I said...
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : Do we say: the subject is munhasir and the predicate is munhasir?
The Shaykh : No, munhasir: a place of restriction, meaning intended as a place for restriction.
The questioner : Shaykh, Shaykh!
The Shaykh : Yes?