His statement, "So know that he is indeed one who fears Allah..." Is this clause a circumstantial clause?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : In his statement: "So know that he is indeed one who fears Allah"
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : Is the clause "that he is indeed one who fears Allah" a circumstantial clause?
The Shaykh : No, if it were not for the "in" (inna), it would have to be in the accusative case, because "know" (i'lam) takes two objects. But when "in" (inna) came, this clause became a new, independent statement, meaning
The questioner : it is in the position of the accusative of the quoted speech.
The Shaykh : No, it occupies the position of the two objects of "know" (i'lam).
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : Is the clause "that he is indeed one who fears Allah" a circumstantial clause?
The Shaykh : No, if it were not for the "in" (inna), it would have to be in the accusative case, because "know" (i'lam) takes two objects. But when "in" (inna) came, this clause became a new, independent statement, meaning
The questioner : it is in the position of the accusative of the quoted speech.
The Shaykh : No, it occupies the position of the two objects of "know" (i'lam).