What is the reasoning behind the fact that the particle "ma" suffices for negating the action, unlike the relative pronoun?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : What is the reasoning behind the fact that the particle "ma" negates the action of "in"?
The Shaykh : What is the reasoning?
The questioner : Giving a reason.
The Shaykh : The reasoning is that it is not possible to apply the action to what follows "ma" while "ma" is present, and for this reason, "ma" is called a negator. Ibn Aqil indicated this, yes.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : The last one, yes.
The questioner : ... it is found in ...
The Shaykh : Yes, and what does he say?
The Shaykh : What is the reasoning?
The questioner : Giving a reason.
The Shaykh : The reasoning is that it is not possible to apply the action to what follows "ma" while "ma" is present, and for this reason, "ma" is called a negator. Ibn Aqil indicated this, yes.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : The last one, yes.
The questioner : ... it is found in ...
The Shaykh : Yes, and what does he say?